public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/2948: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output
@ 2003-05-06  1:57 bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-05-06  1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, sean

Synopsis: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue May  6 01:57:26 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    This report is already quite old -- do you know whether the
    behavior you saw persists with a more recent gcc?
    
    Thanks
      Wolfgang

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2948


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/2948: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output
@ 2003-05-06  2:16 Sean McNeil
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sean McNeil @ 2003-05-06  2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/2948; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2948: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E
	output
Date: 05 May 2003 19:07:48 -0700

 This is very old and my memory on the subject has faded.  I do not
 believe that it is an issue any more.
 
 Please close it somehow.  Thanks.
 
 Sean
 
 On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 18:57, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Tue May  6 01:57:26 2003
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     This report is already quite old -- do you know whether the
 >     behavior you saw persists with a more recent gcc?
 >     
 >     Thanks
 >       Wolfgang
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2948
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/2948: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output
@ 2003-05-06  2:10 bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-05-06  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, sean

Synopsis: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue May  6 02:10:17 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    By request of submitter. Thanks for the quick feedback!
    W.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2948


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-06  2:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-06  1:57 c++/2948: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output bangerth
2003-05-06  2:10 bangerth
2003-05-06  2:16 Sean McNeil

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).