public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
@ 2003-05-10 5:46 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-10 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR optimization/9357; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 22:38:52 -0700
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
trail&database=gcc&pr=9357
Hello,
I can reproduce this bug on 3.2.3 and 3.3 branch but on mainline
(20030509) it compiles fine.
Dara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
@ 2003-02-24 16:56 Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2003-02-24 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR optimization/9357; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
To: janis187@us.ibm.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, maddinp@yahoo.de
Subject: Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa
-funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:46:31 +0100
Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com> writes:
> The regression showed up with this patch:
>
> Sat Oct 27 12:12:09 CEST 2001 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
>
> * cfgcleanup.c (merge_blocks_move_predecessor_nojumps,
> merge_blocks_move_successors_nojumps): Set BB_UPDATE_LIFE.
> (merge_blocks): Properly udpate life after making edge nonfallthru.
> * cfgrtl.c (merge_blocks_nomove): Update global_live_at_end.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9357
This might be the case but -fssa is currently broken AFAIK and not
supported really, so if it cannot get reproduced without -fssa, I
really susspect a SSA issue,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
@ 2003-02-24 16:36 Janis Johnson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Janis Johnson @ 2003-02-24 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR optimization/9357; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, maddinp@yahoo.de
Cc:
Subject: Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa
-funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 08:30:12 -0800
The regression showed up with this patch:
Sat Oct 27 12:12:09 CEST 2001 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
* cfgcleanup.c (merge_blocks_move_predecessor_nojumps,
merge_blocks_move_successors_nojumps): Set BB_UPDATE_LIFE.
(merge_blocks): Properly udpate life after making edge nonfallthru.
* cfgrtl.c (merge_blocks_nomove): Update global_live_at_end.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9357
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
@ 2003-01-17 20:42 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-01-17 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, maddinp, nobody
Old Synopsis: gcc-3.2.1 optimization-crash
New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 17 12:42:37 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. Here's a smaller testcase:
---------------------
void foo() {
typedef void (*fun_ptr)();
fun_ptr *array;
int i;
bar(array);
for (i=0; i<=0x100; i++)
array[i] = &foo;
}
----------------------------
This crashes every compiler since 3.2:
g/a> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/gcc -O -c c64mem.c -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs
c64mem.c: In function `foo':
c64mem.c:8: internal compiler error: Speicherzugriffsfehler
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
It used to work with 3.0.4, so it's a regression.
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9357
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-10 5:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-10 5:46 optimization/9357: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] SegFault with -fssa -funroll-loops -fprofile-arcs Dara Hazeghi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-24 16:56 Andreas Jaeger
2003-02-24 16:36 Janis Johnson
2003-01-17 20:42 bangerth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).