Re: target/10181: [x86] wrong conversion [unsigned -> double] with [-masm=intel]

Re: target/10181: [x86] wrong conversion [unsigned -> double] with [-masm=intel]

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR target/10181; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, markus.mauhart@chello.at
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/10181: [x86] wrong conversion [unsigned -> double] with [-masm=intel]
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:42:57 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=10181
 
 Hello,
 
 could you please verify that this error is still present in a more  
 current gcc release (ie 3.2.3)? With gcc 3.2.3, 3.3 branch and mainline  
 on i686-linux, the testcase works fine (ie conversions are all  
 correct). Thanks,
 
 Dara
 

Re: target/10181: [x86] wrong conversion [unsigned -> double] with [-masm=intel]

[steven]

Synopsis: [x86] wrong conversion [unsigned -> double] with [-masm=intel]

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: steven
State-Changed-When: Mon May 12 10:30:21 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-05/msg00914.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10181

Re: target/10181: [x86] wrong conversion [unsigned -> double] with [-masm=intel]

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR target/10181; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/10181: [x86] wrong conversion [unsigned -> double] with [-masm=intel]
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 17:33:09 -0700 (PDT)

 --- Markus Mauhart <mmauhart@chello.at> wrote:
 > >
 >
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
 > 
 > > trail&database=gcc&pr=10181
 > > 
 > > Hello,
 > > 
 > > could you please verify that this error is still
 > present in a more  
 > > current gcc release (ie 3.2.3)? With gcc 3.2.3,
 > 3.3 branch and mainline  
 > > on i686-linux, the testcase works fine (ie
 > conversions are all  
 > > correct). Thanks,
 > > 
 > > Dara
 > 
 > Unfortunately I cannot test newer GCC versions, mine
 > is
 > "gcc version 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)" from the
 > current Cygwin,
 > and AFAIK it will take some months until there comes
 > a newer
 > 'official' version.
 > Additionally I feel not fit enough for trying to do
 > my private
 > build of newer GCC sources under cygwin.
 > OTOH what you tell about "gcc 3.2.3, 3.3 branch and
 > mainline  
 > on i686-linux" sounds IMHO good enough to close the
 > report.
 
 Okay. I guess we can close it for now then, but if 3.3
 has it, a new bug can be opened.
 
 Dara
 
 __________________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
 http://search.yahoo.com