public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: inline-asm/9413: ICE in illegal asm constraint
@ 2003-05-12 11:27 giovannibajo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo @ 2003-05-12 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dpates, ehrhardt, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody
Synopsis: ICE in illegal asm constraint
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: bajo
State-Changed-When: Mon May 12 11:25:38 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Duplicate of PR 9860.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9413
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: inline-asm/9413: ICE in illegal asm constraint
@ 2003-05-10 6:16 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-10 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR inline-asm/9413; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: inline-asm/9413: ICE in illegal asm constraint
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 23:09:54 -0700
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
trail&database=gcc&pr=9413
This is a duplicate of PR 9860
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: inline-asm/9413: ICE in illegal asm constraint
@ 2003-01-24 13:29 ehrhardt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ehrhardt @ 2003-01-24 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dpates, ehrhardt, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody
Old Synopsis: Internal compiler error received
New Synopsis: ICE in illegal asm constraint
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: cae
State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 24 13:29:45 2003
State-Changed-Why:
The code is actually illegal, please report this with the
author of the original code. However, gcc still shouldn't ice.
The testcase can be reduce to the following:
------- cut ------
void foo(void)
{
__asm__ __volatile__( "" : : "A" ((void)(3)));
}
------- cut ------
Obviously the code wasn't originally written like this but used typeof
and most likely macros as in the following example:
#define BLAH(X) __asm__ __volatile__( "" : : "A" ((__typeof__(*(X)))(3)))
void foo(void * argv)
{
BLAH(argv);
}
The ICE has been there ever since at least 2.95.2, i.e. not a regression.
With recent 3.4 the ICE is here:
9413-2.c: In function `foo':
9413-2.c:4: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn_1, at expr.c:3484
Please submit a full bug report,
regards Christian
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9413
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-12 11:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-12 11:27 inline-asm/9413: ICE in illegal asm constraint giovannibajo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-10 6:16 Dara Hazeghi
2003-01-24 13:29 ehrhardt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).