public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: bootstrap/3550: "touch" still in libiberty/Makefile.in, gcc/mklibgcc.in
@ 2003-05-14  8:46 Dara Hazeghi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-14  8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3550; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3550: "touch" still in libiberty/Makefile.in, gcc/mklibgcc.in
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 01:38:33 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=3550
 
 e-mail to original submitter bounced. But to answer my own question,  
 yes this still is an issue. Would anybody like to volunteer to get rid  
 of touch from the makefiles? :-)
 
 Dara
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: bootstrap/3550: "touch" still in libiberty/Makefile.in, gcc/mklibgcc.in
@ 2003-05-14  8:36 Dara Hazeghi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-14  8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3550; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: chastain@redhat.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3550: "touch" still in libiberty/Makefile.in, gcc/mklibgcc.in
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 01:27:59 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=3550
 
 Hello,
 
 do you know what's the status of this bug? Has anyone gotten around to  
 removing the uses of "touch" from mainline or 3.3 branch yet? Thanks,
 
 Draa
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* bootstrap/3550: "touch" still in libiberty/Makefile.in, gcc/mklibgcc.in
@ 2001-07-03 14:46 chastain
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: chastain @ 2001-07-03 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats

>Number:         3550
>Category:       bootstrap
>Synopsis:       "touch" still in libiberty/Makefile.in, gcc/mklibgcc.in
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Jul 03 14:46:03 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Michael Chastain
>Release:        gcc 3.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
native solaris 2.7
>Description:
gcc/Makefile.in does not use the the "touch" command because of bugs with nanosecond time stamps on native solaris 2.7 and native solaris 2.8.

Hoever, libiberty/Makefile.in and gcc/mklibgcc.in still have "touch" commands in them.
I have seen unreproducible build failures which look like the fault of "touch".

See:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-05/msg00487.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-06/msg01558.html
>How-To-Repeat:
I can't squeeze a reproducible failure out of this.
>Fix:
Change libiberty/Makefile.in and gcc/mklibgcc.in to use a different command to make timestamp files,
just as gcc/Makefile.in uses a $(STAMP) command.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-14  8:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-14  8:46 bootstrap/3550: "touch" still in libiberty/Makefile.in, gcc/mklibgcc.in Dara Hazeghi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-14  8:36 Dara Hazeghi
2001-07-03 14:46 chastain

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).