public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
@ 2003-05-14 10:53 giovannibajo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo @ 2003-05-14 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: anamax, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody
Synopsis: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bajo
State-Changed-When: Wed May 14 10:53:12 2003
State-Changed-Why:
See Dara's question.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7323
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
@ 2003-05-14 9:26 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-14 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/7323; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, anamax@earthlink.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 02:16:33 -0700
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
trail&database=gcc&pr=7323
Hello,
does the submitter still consider the reported behavior a bug? If so, I
guess we can update the documentation... Thanks,
Dara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
@ 2002-07-15 22:56 Andy Freeman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andy Freeman @ 2002-07-15 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/7323; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Andy Freeman" <anamax@earthlink.net>
To: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 22:52:12 -0700
Huh?
I suspect g++/ld knew where the correct library was when they generated
the executable, so why isn't that info in the executable for startup? Why
is it a good thing that it isn't?
In other words, are you saying that I have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH
correctly before I start each executable.... (There are at least two ways
to end up with different libraries that have the same base name+extension,
so if the lookup is by file base name+extension, there's no way to have a
single LD_LIBRARY_PATH that is always correct at startup.)
-andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: <anamax@earthlink.net>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
> The fix is really to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include your prefix:
> /home/andy/GCC3.1/gcc-3.1-bin.
>
> This is because gcc now uses shared libraries and you did not
> install gcc where ld*.so find them.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
@ 2002-07-15 21:46 Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2002-07-15 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/7323; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: anamax@earthlink.net
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:40:28 -0400
The fix is really to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include your prefix:
/home/andy/GCC3.1/gcc-3.1-bin.
This is because gcc now uses shared libraries and you did not
install gcc where ld*.so find them.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
@ 2002-07-15 21:36 anamax
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: anamax @ 2002-07-15 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 7323
>Category: bootstrap
>Synopsis: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: rejects-legal
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Jul 15 21:36:00 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Andy Freeman
>Release: unknown-1.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
x86 redhat 7.3
>Description:
If one configures, builds, and installs GCC/g++ as described by the gcc -v output attached, the executable doesn't know where to find libstdc++.so.4 (as a shared library) on startup.
>How-To-Repeat:
configure, build, and install as noted. Compile a c++ program. Try to run it.
>Fix:
Can workaround by using -static
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: text/plain; name="specs.txt"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="specs.txt"
Reading specs from gcc-3.1-bin/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.1/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-3.1/configure --prefix=/home/andy/GCC3.1/gcc-3.1-bin --with-local-prefix=/home/andy/GCC3.1/gcc-3.1-include --program-suffix=3.1 --enable-threads=posix --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-languages=c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-14 10:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-14 10:53 bootstrap/7323: Install failed to property account for libstdc++ location giovannibajo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-14 9:26 Dara Hazeghi
2002-07-15 22:56 Andy Freeman
2002-07-15 21:46 Andrew Pinski
2002-07-15 21:36 anamax
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).