public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
@ 2003-05-14 17:30 drow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: drow @ 2003-05-14 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dan, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, rodrigc
Synopsis: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: drow
State-Changed-When: Wed May 14 17:30:38 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Not a bug after all.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3641
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
@ 2003-05-14 17:36 Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-05-14 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rodrigc; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3641; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:30:58 -0400
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:41:31AM -0700, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
> trail&database=gcc&pr=3641
>
> Hello,
>
> there hasn't been an update to this PR in over a year. Does anybody
> know if there's been any progress or changes in since then? Thanks,
Thanks, I've closed it. The consensus was that this is not a bug.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
@ 2003-05-14 8:46 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-14 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rodrigc; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3641; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: drow@mvista.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, dan@debian.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 01:41:31 -0700
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
trail&database=gcc&pr=3641
Hello,
there hasn't been an update to this PR in over a year. Does anybody
know if there's been any progress or changes in since then? Thanks,
Dara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
@ 2002-01-27 17:46 Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-01-27 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rodrigc; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3641; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:44:37 -0500
Richard's verdict was that we should be going through make
install_headers in glibc first instead of worrying about this.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:39:57AM -0000, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> Synopsis: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rodrigc
> Responsible-Changed-By: rodrigc
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 27 17:39:57 2002
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> looking at it
> State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed
> State-Changed-By: rodrigc
> State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 27 17:39:57 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> looking at it
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3641
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
@ 2002-01-27 17:39 rodrigc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2002-01-27 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dan, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, rodrigc
Synopsis: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rodrigc
Responsible-Changed-By: rodrigc
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 27 17:39:57 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
looking at it
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 27 17:39:57 2002
State-Changed-Why:
looking at it
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3641
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
@ 2001-10-29 8:36 Craig Rodrigues
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Craig Rodrigues @ 2001-10-29 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3641; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gnu.org
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:32:16 -0500
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 10:59:45AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> (if there's a better way to add info to a GNATS bug than Reply To All,
> without having a GNATS account, it would be nice if it was mentioned
> somewhere obvious.)
To append info to a GNATS entry, make sure you CC:
gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, and make sure that the Subject:
field of your e-mail contains the GNATS ID for the Problem Report,
ie.
"Subject: Re: Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on....."
If you can figure out a good place to put this in documentation,
I'll write a patch for it.
> I talked to Richard Henderson about this, and for my problem (which
> involved glibc 2.2.3 or 2.2.4) the correct solution was to make a
> libc-headers package instead of modifying GCC. That probably doesn't
> help you. I have a patch to hardcode the data structures in question
> if you want it.
There is a patch very similar to what you are talking about,
but meant to address the problem of bootstrapping on
older versions of glibc.
I submitted this patch, to detect the existence of ucontext.h
in the configure script:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-10/msg01543.html
The next part of the patch, which I have not tested yet is
here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=4068&database=gcc
Does that patch look like it would work for your problem?
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://www.gis.net/~craigr
rodrigc@mediaone.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
@ 2001-10-28 20:35 rodrigc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2001-10-28 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dan, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, rodrigc
Synopsis: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 28 20:35:27 2001
State-Changed-Why:
What version of libc are you trying to bootstrap on?
I am trying to come up with a patch that addresses
this problem when trying to bootstrap on glibc 2.0, which
lacks sys/ucontext.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3641&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
@ 2001-07-10 16:56 dan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dan @ 2001-07-10 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 3641
>Category: bootstrap
>Synopsis: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Tue Jul 10 16:56:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: dan@debian.org
>Release: gcc-3.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR wants to be able to unwind
the stack through signal frames, so it uses <signal.h> and <sys/ucontext.h>
to find the sigcontext's members. If you do not have a libc for your target, libgcc can not be compiled, because those headers are not found.
It's easy to work around this by adding #ifndef inhibit_libc, but the compiled
copies are included in a glibc built with that compiler (currently), and
so stick around. I should not have to rebuild glibc a second time just to get
this correct. Would hardcoding the necessary offsets or structures be an
acceptable alternative to including the header files? If so, I can make a patch.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-14 17:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-14 17:30 bootstrap/3641: can not bootstrap on i386-linux and others without glibc - MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR drow
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-14 17:36 Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-14 8:46 Dara Hazeghi
2002-01-27 17:46 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-27 17:39 rodrigc
2001-10-29 8:36 Craig Rodrigues
2001-10-28 20:35 rodrigc
2001-07-10 16:56 dan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).