public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/10790: g++/gcc
@ 2003-05-14 19:16 Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2003-05-14 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/10790; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: lgang@yahoo.com, "Gcc-Bugs@Gcc. Gnu. Org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10790: g++/gcc
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 15:09:40 -0400
This is a GCC extension so it is not a bug, use -pedantic or
-pedantic-errors to see that they are not accepted.
I get some warnings or errors if -pedantic-errors:
test2.cc: In function `int main()':
test2.cc:7: warning: ISO C++ forbids variable-size array `arr'
test2.cc:9: warning: ISO C++ forbids variable-size array `arr2'
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
PS can someone close this bug as it is not really a bug but a
misunderstanding of GCC extensions.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 13:59 US/Eastern, lgang@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Number: 10790
>> Category: c++
>> Synopsis: g++/gcc
>> Confidential: no
>> Severity: serious
>> Priority: medium
>> Responsible: unassigned
>> State: open
>> Class: sw-bug
>> Submitter-Id: net
>> Arrival-Date: Wed May 14 18:06:00 UTC 2003
>> Closed-Date:
>> Last-Modified:
>> Originator: lgang@yahoo.com
>> Release: G++ 3.2
>> Organization:
>> Environment:
> Solaris 8
>> Description:
> Should a non-constant array be allowed in C/C++? I guess not. See the
> following code.
>
> int main()
> {
> int c;
> scanf("%d", &c);
> int arr[c];
> int p;
> char arr2[c];
> int another;
> printf ("Terrible, diff=%d, diff=%d\n",
> (char*)&c-(char*)&p, (char*)&p - (char*)&another);
> return 0;
> }
>
> Seems that compiler treats it int arr[c] as int *arr. I don't think
> it should compile.
>
> Thanks
>> How-To-Repeat:
>
>> Fix:
>
>> Release-Note:
>> Audit-Trail:
>> Unformatted:
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/10790: g++/gcc
@ 2003-05-14 21:02 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-05-14 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, lgang, nobody
Synopsis: g++/gcc
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed May 14 21:02:11 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Not a bug but a gcc extension
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10790
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* c++/10790: g++/gcc
@ 2003-05-14 18:06 lgang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: lgang @ 2003-05-14 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 10790
>Category: c++
>Synopsis: g++/gcc
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Wed May 14 18:06:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: lgang@yahoo.com
>Release: G++ 3.2
>Organization:
>Environment:
Solaris 8
>Description:
Should a non-constant array be allowed in C/C++? I guess not. See the following code.
int main()
{
int c;
scanf("%d", &c);
int arr[c];
int p;
char arr2[c];
int another;
printf ("Terrible, diff=%d, diff=%d\n",
(char*)&c-(char*)&p, (char*)&p - (char*)&another);
return 0;
}
Seems that compiler treats it int arr[c] as int *arr. I don't think it should compile.
Thanks
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-14 21:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-14 19:16 c++/10790: g++/gcc Andrew Pinski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-14 21:02 bangerth
2003-05-14 18:06 lgang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).