Re: target/7462: [powerpc] Bad code for unalign access

Re: target/7462: [powerpc] Bad code for unalign access

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR target/7462; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: hjwidmai@foxboro.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/7462: [powerpc] Bad code for unalign access
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 03:01:54 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=7462
 
 Hello,
 
 gcc 3.1.1 is a bit old, and a fair bit has changed since then. Would it  
 be possible for you to check whether this problem is still present with  
 gcc 3.3? Thanks,
 
 Dara
 

Re: target/7462: [powerpc] Bad code for unalign access

[ehrhardt]

Synopsis: [powerpc] Bad code for unalign access

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: cae
State-Changed-When: Wed May 21 08:53:57 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Reported fixed in 3.3.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7462

Re: target/7462: [powerpc] Bad code for unalign access

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR target/7462; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: Hans-Joachim Widmaier <hjwidmai@foxboro.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/7462: [powerpc] Bad code for unalign access
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:54:37 -0700 (PDT)

 --- Hans-Joachim Widmaier <hjwidmai@foxboro.com>
 wrote:
 > Dara Hazeghi:
 > >
 >
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
 > 
 > > trail&database=gcc&pr=7462
 > > 
 > > Hello,
 > > 
 > > gcc 3.1.1 is a bit old, and a fair bit has changed
 > since then. Would it  
 > > be possible for you to check whether this problem
 > is still present with  
 > > gcc 3.3? Thanks,
 > 
 > Hello,
 > 
 > a quick test showed that gcc 3.3 indeed seems to do
 > that right. So that
 > bug can be closed. Alas, it creates new sections
 > which our link script doesn't
 > cater for, and a rebuild of the whole project raised
 > an internal compiler error.
 > Since I'm a bit tight on time, I will defer
 > investigating that further and
 > revert to gcc 3.2.2.
 
 Sorry to see that 3.3 brings new bugs! When you get a
 chance, please report the new problem you've found.
 Meanwhile we'll close this bug.
 
 Dara
 
 __________________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
 http://search.yahoo.com