preprocessor/8602: incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions

preprocessor/8602: incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions

[Matthias Klose]

>Number:         8602
>Category:       preprocessor
>Synopsis:       incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Nov 16 02:06:02 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
>Release:        3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Organization:
The Debian Project
>Environment:
System: Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
Architecture: i686
host: i386-linux
Configured with: /home/packages/gcc/3.2/gcc-3.2-3.2.1ds5/src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc,ada --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.2 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-objc-gc i386-linux
>Description:
[ Reported to the Debian BTS as report #153965.
  Please CC 153965@bugs.debian.org on replies.
  Log of report can be found at http://bugs.debian.org/153965 ]
-----
static inline int
foo(int x)
{
  if (!x)
    return 0;
}

int main(void)
{
  foo(1);
  return 1;
}
-----

$ gcc-2.95 -Wall -c !$
gcc-2.95 -Wall -c bug-153965.c
bug-153965.c: In function `foo':
bug-153965.c:6: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
            ^^^
$ gcc-3.2 -Wall -c bug-153965.c
bug-153965.c: In function `foo':
bug-153965.c:13: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
            ^^^^
$ gcc-3.3 -Wall -c bug-153965.c
bug-153965.c: In function `foo':
bug-153965.c:13: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
           ^^^^^
gcc 3.[23] also produces correct line numbers if either "static" or
"inline" is removed from foo. Removing the body of function foo()
causes a secondary warning to be generated in the right place, but the
original warning still has the wrong line number.

[gcc-3.2 is gcc-3.2.1 20021111, gcc-3.3 is HEAD 20021103]

>How-To-Repeat:
	
>Fix:
	
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: