* Re: Assembly in Gcc
@ 2001-12-04 20:05 mike stump
2001-12-10 15:36 ` More Assembly Questions Mark Cuss
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: mike stump @ 2001-12-04 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grahams, mcuss, tprince; +Cc: gcc
> From: "Tim Prince" <tprince@computer.org>
> To: "Graham Stott" <grahams@redhat.com>, <mcuss@cdlsystems.com>
> Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:37:13 -0800
> Much as I dislike the MSVC style, this would be a valuable contribution.
The style I think predates MSVC. The small C compiler I had, had that
syntax. I think it started out that way (I didn't add it). I think
I'd support the addition of the syntax.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* More Assembly Questions....
2001-12-04 20:05 Assembly in Gcc mike stump
@ 2001-12-10 15:36 ` Mark Cuss
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Cuss @ 2001-12-10 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hello all,
I am having problems using the "mmword" assembly directive on some inline
assembly code which I am compiling in gcc. I issued the -m486 and -o2 flags
but the assembler still is upset. Does anyone know which command line
options I have to issue to make this work?
My apologies for the newbie question - I am new to embedding assembly into a
gcc compiled program...
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-10 23:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-04 20:05 Assembly in Gcc mike stump
2001-12-10 15:36 ` More Assembly Questions Mark Cuss
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).