Re:

[Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>]

  In message < 9802101122.AA29122@bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de >you write:
  > No, but following the mailing lists, there are coming in bug reports and
  > patches for fixes/enhancements of egcs-1.0.1 and of the current egcs
  > snapshots/cvs tree mixed altogether.
Yup.

  > I was thinking it would be nice to have an archive of patches that can be 
  > apllied to the last egcs-release, separated from all the patches that can 
  > only  be applied to the snapshots.
Ah yes.  Did you read the initial message about 1.0.2?  It had this line:

  Right now these are only available on the cvs server; I'll bundle
  them up for ftp after I take care of a few more critical fixes.

Which to be more explicit means we'll be providing (via ftp) patches folks
can use to turn 1.0.1 into pre-release versions of 1.0.2.  This is also how
we handle the 1.0.1 release (look in the snapshots/1.0.1-prerelease dir).


  > I know that for you development guys the snapshots are more important to
  > move forward, but shouldn't we make the releases as 'bugfree' as possible.
It's a nice goal, but at some point you have to say "critical fixes only",
else we'd have to pull in most of the development tree, which unstabilizes
things...

That's why we don't try to fix every bug in minor releases...  It is a tough
decision to make, but necessary.

  > Or is all this even possible by just checking out the release tree from the
  > cvs-sources regularly ?
Yes -- if you update your release tree via cvs you'll get whatever patches
we've applied to to the release tree.  That's precisely why we install the
changes in the release branch -- so folks can get them them at any time.

jeff