* Re: pgcc and gcc question
[not found] <Pine.GSO.3.95q.971017112726.1906A-100000@nic.com>
@ 1997-10-17 12:53 ` Doug Evans
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Doug Evans @ 1997-10-17 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dave; +Cc: linux-gcc, egcs
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 11:29:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dave Wreski <dave@nic.com>
Hi all. I mailed the maintainers of the pentium gcc compiler, but never
got a response. I'm hoping someone can help me here.
I'm starting to hear more and more about pgcc vs gcc, and wondered which I
should be using.
Why haven't these pentium optimizations been included in the normal gcc
compiler?
If they are so great, I would think they would be included in the normal
gcc release..
I would suggest asking this question in egcs@cygnus.com.
[So I've cc'd them ...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1997-10-17 12:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <Pine.GSO.3.95q.971017112726.1906A-100000@nic.com>
1997-10-17 12:53 ` pgcc and gcc question Doug Evans
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).