* Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics?
@ 2003-05-20 18:29 H. J. Lu
2003-05-20 18:29 ` Jan Hubicka
2003-05-20 18:59 ` Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics? Guillermo Ballester Valor
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: H. J. Lu @ 2003-05-20 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
The current gcc only supports SSE intrinsics. I'd like to add SSE2
intrinsics. Is anyone working on that? They are
http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/resources/user_guides/intel/c_ug/linux114.htm
If you are working on that, please drop me a line.
Thanks.
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics?
2003-05-20 18:29 Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics? H. J. Lu
@ 2003-05-20 18:29 ` Jan Hubicka
2003-05-29 17:54 ` MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem H. J. Lu
2003-05-20 18:59 ` Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics? Guillermo Ballester Valor
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jan Hubicka @ 2003-05-20 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: gcc
> The current gcc only supports SSE intrinsics. I'd like to add SSE2
> intrinsics. Is anyone working on that? They are
SSE2 intrinsics are supported by 3.3. There are still some problems
remaining so if you have some code to test these on it would be cool.
I am trying to fix the bugs from gnats regularry for these.
Honza
>
> http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/resources/user_guides/intel/c_ug/linux114.htm
>
> If you are working on that, please drop me a line.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics?
2003-05-20 18:29 Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics? H. J. Lu
2003-05-20 18:29 ` Jan Hubicka
@ 2003-05-20 18:59 ` Guillermo Ballester Valor
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Guillermo Ballester Valor @ 2003-05-20 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hi,
On Tuesday 20 May 2003 20:24, H. J. Lu wrote:
> The current gcc only supports SSE intrinsics. I'd like to add SSE2
> intrinsics. Is anyone working on that? They are
>
> http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/resources/user_guides/intel/c_ug/linux114.htm
>
> If you are working on that, please drop me a line.
>
Just me have working (better said 'using') calls to intrinsic Intel SSE2
library. Since last two months or so there is a problem in GCC 3.3, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10504
HEAD GCC 3.4 version works well to me. I'm waiting to see the problems in 3.3
solved. Unfortunately, I'm not skill in GCC to give a PATCH for PR10504.
Guillermo.
--
Guillermo Ballester Valor
registered linux user #117181
gbv@oxixares.com
Ogijares, Granada SPAIN
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-20 18:29 ` Jan Hubicka
@ 2003-05-29 17:54 ` H. J. Lu
2003-05-29 17:58 ` David Edelsohn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: H. J. Lu @ 2003-05-29 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Hubicka; +Cc: gcc, dberlin
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:29:15PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > The current gcc only supports SSE intrinsics. I'd like to add SSE2
> > intrinsics. Is anyone working on that? They are
> SSE2 intrinsics are supported by 3.3. There are still some problems
> remaining so if you have some code to test these on it would be cool.
> I am trying to fix the bugs from gnats regularry for these.
>
> Honza
I opened a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11031
and tried to assign it to jh@suse.cz. But I got
Not allowed
You tried to change the bug_status field from UNCONFIRMED to NEW, but only the
owner or submitter of the bug, or a sufficiently empowered user, may change
that field.
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-29 17:54 ` MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem H. J. Lu
@ 2003-05-29 17:58 ` David Edelsohn
2003-05-29 18:44 ` H. J. Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Edelsohn @ 2003-05-29 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: Jan Hubicka, gcc, dberlin
>>>>> H J Lu writes:
HJ> I opened a bug
HJ> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11031
HJ> and tried to assign it to jh@suse.cz. But I got
HJ> Not allowed
HJ> You tried to change the bug_status field from UNCONFIRMED to NEW, but only the
HJ> owner or submitter of the bug, or a sufficiently empowered user, may change
HJ> that field.
Did you try to Confirm it or try to Reassign?
You may need to accept the bug yourself and then reassign it to
Honza as a two-step process.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-29 17:58 ` David Edelsohn
@ 2003-05-29 18:44 ` H. J. Lu
2003-05-29 19:46 ` Jeff Sturm
2003-05-29 21:43 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: H. J. Lu @ 2003-05-29 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Edelsohn; +Cc: gcc, dberlin
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:49:01PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> H J Lu writes:
>
> HJ> I opened a bug
>
> HJ> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11031
>
> HJ> and tried to assign it to jh@suse.cz. But I got
>
> HJ> Not allowed
>
> HJ> You tried to change the bug_status field from UNCONFIRMED to NEW, but only the
> HJ> owner or submitter of the bug, or a sufficiently empowered user, may change
> HJ> that field.
>
> Did you try to Confirm it or try to Reassign?
>
> You may need to accept the bug yourself and then reassign it to
> Honza as a two-step process.
>
It won't allow me to change the bug status. Bugzilla may restrict what
I, hjl@lucon.org, can do to a bug.
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-29 18:44 ` H. J. Lu
@ 2003-05-29 19:46 ` Jeff Sturm
2003-05-29 20:04 ` H. J. Lu
2003-05-29 21:43 ` Daniel Berlin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Sturm @ 2003-05-29 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: David Edelsohn, gcc, dberlin
On Thu, 29 May 2003, H. J. Lu wrote:
> It won't allow me to change the bug status. Bugzilla may restrict what
> I, hjl@lucon.org, can do to a bug.
I discovered by accident I could log in as either jsturm@one-point.com or
jsturm@gcc.gnu.org. The former account is more restricted than the
latter.
Did you have a gnats account? If so, I suppose you also have a
@gcc.gnu.org mail alias.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-29 19:46 ` Jeff Sturm
@ 2003-05-29 20:04 ` H. J. Lu
2003-05-29 21:45 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: H. J. Lu @ 2003-05-29 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Sturm; +Cc: David Edelsohn, gcc, dberlin
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:59:20PM -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2003, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > It won't allow me to change the bug status. Bugzilla may restrict what
> > I, hjl@lucon.org, can do to a bug.
>
> I discovered by accident I could log in as either jsturm@one-point.com or
> jsturm@gcc.gnu.org. The former account is more restricted than the
> latter.
>
> Did you have a gnats account? If so, I suppose you also have a
> @gcc.gnu.org mail alias.
>
I didn't have a gnats account. But I do have hjl@gcc.gnu.org, which
is not a valid bugzilla account. I don't want to create a new account
for hjl@gcc.gnu.org. How can I get more permission for hjl@lucon.org?
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-29 18:44 ` H. J. Lu
2003-05-29 19:46 ` Jeff Sturm
@ 2003-05-29 21:43 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-29 22:25 ` Joe Buck
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-29 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: David Edelsohn, gcc
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 02:18 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:49:01PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>>>>> H J Lu writes:
>>
>> HJ> I opened a bug
>>
>> HJ> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11031
>>
>> HJ> and tried to assign it to jh@suse.cz. But I got
>>
>> HJ> Not allowed
>>
>> HJ> You tried to change the bug_status field from UNCONFIRMED to NEW,
>> but only the
>> HJ> owner or submitter of the bug, or a sufficiently empowered user,
>> may change
>> HJ> that field.
>>
>> Did you try to Confirm it or try to Reassign?
>>
>> You may need to accept the bug yourself and then reassign it to
>> Honza as a two-step process.
>>
>
> It won't allow me to change the bug status. Bugzilla may restrict what
> I, hjl@lucon.org, can do to a bug.
Fixed.
I set the wrong perm bit when i edited your user.
>
>
> H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-29 20:04 ` H. J. Lu
@ 2003-05-29 21:45 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-29 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: Jeff Sturm, David Edelsohn, gcc
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 03:05 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:59:20PM -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 May 2003, H. J. Lu wrote:
>>> It won't allow me to change the bug status. Bugzilla may restrict
>>> what
>>> I, hjl@lucon.org, can do to a bug.
>>
>> I discovered by accident I could log in as either
>> jsturm@one-point.com or
>> jsturm@gcc.gnu.org. The former account is more restricted than the
>> latter.
>>
>> Did you have a gnats account? If so, I suppose you also have a
>> @gcc.gnu.org mail alias.
>>
>
> I didn't have a gnats account. But I do have hjl@gcc.gnu.org, which
> is not a valid bugzilla account. I don't want to create a new account
> for hjl@gcc.gnu.org. How can I get more permission for hjl@lucon.org?
>
You ask someone with bugzilla write perms, like me, and i fix it.
:)
>
> H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-29 21:43 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-05-29 22:25 ` Joe Buck
2003-05-30 0:40 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2003-05-29 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: H. J. Lu, David Edelsohn, gcc
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:07:32PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > It won't allow me to change the bug status. Bugzilla may restrict what
> > I, hjl@lucon.org, can do to a bug.
> Fixed.
> I set the wrong perm bit when i edited your user.
It looks like it's wrong for me as well: I'm supposed to have write
permission.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem
2003-05-29 22:25 ` Joe Buck
@ 2003-05-30 0:40 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-30 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Buck; +Cc: H. J. Lu, David Edelsohn, gcc
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 05:45 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:07:32PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>>> It won't allow me to change the bug status. Bugzilla may restrict
>>> what
>>> I, hjl@lucon.org, can do to a bug.
>> Fixed.
>> I set the wrong perm bit when i edited your user.
>
> It looks like it's wrong for me as well: I'm supposed to have write
> permission.
>
You have a jbuck@gcc.gnu.org account that should have write perms.
If you want me to merge the two accounts, so you only have
jbuck@gcc.gnu.org (or jbuck@synopsys.com, for that matter), let me know.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-29 22:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-20 18:29 Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics? H. J. Lu
2003-05-20 18:29 ` Jan Hubicka
2003-05-29 17:54 ` MMX/SSE/SSE2 intrinsics bugs and bugzilla problem H. J. Lu
2003-05-29 17:58 ` David Edelsohn
2003-05-29 18:44 ` H. J. Lu
2003-05-29 19:46 ` Jeff Sturm
2003-05-29 20:04 ` H. J. Lu
2003-05-29 21:45 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-29 21:43 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-29 22:25 ` Joe Buck
2003-05-30 0:40 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-20 18:59 ` Is anyone working on SSE2 intrinsics? Guillermo Ballester Valor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).