* Native GNAT (Ada) Support
@ 2004-09-03 14:06 Bob Rossi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bob Rossi @ 2004-09-03 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hi,
I was wondering about the quality of the Ada support in the gcc 3.4.
Is it considered to be as stable as an official GNAT release?
(For example gcc 3.4 vs Gnat 3.14p)
Is the quality of the Ada support considered when making an official
release of gcc? Or is only the C and C++ and other mainline languages
considered?
I'm considering to use gcc's native ada support instead of using Gnat's
versions (3.14p) of the software.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Native GNAT (Ada) Support
@ 2004-09-03 14:11 Richard Kenner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Kenner @ 2004-09-03 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bob; +Cc: gcc
Is it considered to be as stable as an official GNAT release?
(For example gcc 3.4 vs Gnat 3.14p)
GNAT 3.x is based on GCC 2.8.1. GNAT 5.x is based on GCC 3.x.
Is the quality of the Ada support considered when making an official
release of gcc?
Not yet.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-03 14:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-03 14:06 Native GNAT (Ada) Support Bob Rossi
2004-09-03 14:11 Richard Kenner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).