public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Is gcc mainline parallel build safe?
@ 2004-09-04  0:26 H. J. Lu
  2004-09-06 22:09 ` James E Wilson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: H. J. Lu @ 2004-09-04  0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc

With "make -j N" under an SMP kernel, I got

...
./fixinc.sh: line 143: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-ia64-linux/gcc/cc1:
No such file or directory
...


H.J.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Is gcc mainline parallel build safe?
  2004-09-04  0:26 Is gcc mainline parallel build safe? H. J. Lu
@ 2004-09-06 22:09 ` James E Wilson
  2004-09-06 23:33   ` H. J. Lu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James E Wilson @ 2004-09-06 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: gcc, bonzini

H. J. Lu wrote:
> ./fixinc.sh: line 143: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-ia64-linux/gcc/cc1:
> No such file or directory

Paolo's recent fixinc rewrite (2004-08-31) replaced a sed command on the 
specs file with a "cc -dM" command.  Unfortunately, fixinc has a 
dependence on the specs file, but no dependence on cc1, thus breaking 
parallel make.  We just need to add this dependence somewhere.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Is gcc mainline parallel build safe?
  2004-09-06 22:09 ` James E Wilson
@ 2004-09-06 23:33   ` H. J. Lu
  2004-09-08 20:35     ` Mark Mitchell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: H. J. Lu @ 2004-09-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James E Wilson; +Cc: gcc, bonzini

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:09:29PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
> >./fixinc.sh: line 143: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-ia64-linux/gcc/cc1:
> >No such file or directory
> 
> Paolo's recent fixinc rewrite (2004-08-31) replaced a sed command on the 
> specs file with a "cc -dM" command.  Unfortunately, fixinc has a 
> dependence on the specs file, but no dependence on cc1, thus breaking 
> parallel make.  We just need to add this dependence somewhere.

The patch is at

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00544.html


H.J.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Is gcc mainline parallel build safe?
  2004-09-06 23:33   ` H. J. Lu
@ 2004-09-08 20:35     ` Mark Mitchell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2004-09-08 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: H. J. Lu; +Cc: James E Wilson, gcc, bonzini

H. J. Lu wrote:

>On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:09:29PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
>  
>
>>H. J. Lu wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>./fixinc.sh: line 143: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-ia64-linux/gcc/cc1:
>>>No such file or directory
>>>      
>>>
>>Paolo's recent fixinc rewrite (2004-08-31) replaced a sed command on the 
>>specs file with a "cc -dM" command.  Unfortunately, fixinc has a 
>>dependence on the specs file, but no dependence on cc1, thus breaking 
>>parallel make.  We just need to add this dependence somewhere.
>>    
>>
>
>The patch is at
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00544.html
>  
>
OK.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-08 20:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-04  0:26 Is gcc mainline parallel build safe? H. J. Lu
2004-09-06 22:09 ` James E Wilson
2004-09-06 23:33   ` H. J. Lu
2004-09-08 20:35     ` Mark Mitchell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).