* m32c vs loop-opts - possible work-around
@ 2009-09-09 2:45 DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2009-09-09 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
If loop optimization assumes sizeof(void *) == sizeof(size_t) and
won't work correctly otherwise, perhaps a check for that condition in
gate_tree_ssa_loop_ivopts() would be appropriate? I thought of just
disabling that flag in m32c.c, but I figured a more generic solution
would make more sense, and occasionally get the attention of the loop
maintainers to remind them of the limitation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-09-09 2:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-09 2:45 m32c vs loop-opts - possible work-around DJ Delorie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).