* GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release
@ 2019-08-05 13:22 Jakub Jelinek
2019-08-05 17:03 ` Martin Sebor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2019-08-05 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Status
======
The first 9.2 release candidate has been released.
The GCC 9 branch is frozen for preparation of the GCC 9.2 release.
All changes to the branch now require release manager approval.
Quality Data
============
Priority # Change from last report
-------- --- -----------------------
P1 0
P2 198 - 6
P3 49 - 3
P4 141 - 2
P5 24
-------- --- -----------------------
Total P1-P3 247 - 9
Total 412 - 11
Previous Report
===============
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-07/msg00203.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release
2019-08-05 13:22 GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release Jakub Jelinek
@ 2019-08-05 17:03 ` Martin Sebor
2019-08-06 7:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Sebor @ 2019-08-05 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek, gcc
On 8/5/19 7:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ======
>
> The first 9.2 release candidate has been released.
> The GCC 9 branch is frozen for preparation of the GCC 9.2 release.
> All changes to the branch now require release manager approval.
Can I get an approval to backport the fix for pr90947 - [9 Regression]
Simple lookup table of array of strings is miscompiled​?
Thanks
Martin
>
>
> Quality Data
> ============
>
> Priority # Change from last report
> -------- --- -----------------------
> P1 0
> P2 198 - 6
> P3 49 - 3
> P4 141 - 2
> P5 24
> -------- --- -----------------------
> Total P1-P3 247 - 9
> Total 412 - 11
>
>
> Previous Report
> ===============
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-07/msg00203.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release
2019-08-05 17:03 ` Martin Sebor
@ 2019-08-06 7:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2019-08-06 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Sebor; +Cc: gcc
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:03:02AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 8/5/19 7:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Status
> > ======
> >
> > The first 9.2 release candidate has been released.
> > The GCC 9 branch is frozen for preparation of the GCC 9.2 release.
> > All changes to the branch now require release manager approval.
>
> Can I get an approval to backport the fix for pr90947 - [9 Regression]
> Simple lookup table of array of strings is miscompiled​?
That would require another rc. Unless we are forced to do it anyway for
other more urgent reasons, I'd prefer to defer for 9.3, you can test now but
commit after the release.
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release
@ 2019-08-08 14:49 Tom Honermann
2019-08-08 15:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Honermann @ 2019-08-08 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc, Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Jason Merrill
> Status
> ======
>
> The first 9.2 release candidate has been released.
> The GCC 9 branch is frozen for preparation of the GCC 9.2 release.
> All changes to the branch now require release manager approval.
Hi, Jakub. If at all possible, I'd like to request that a back port of
PR c++/88095 [1] be included in the gcc 9.2 release.
The rationale for including this is that it is required for one of the
approaches discussed in P1423 [2] (see [3]) that may be useful for some
programmers to mitigate backward compatibility impact from the adoption
of char8_t in C++20 via P0482 [4]. Having this feature working in 9.2
would give impacted programmers more time to evaluate their C++20
migration options.
The patch has already been integrated in trunk [5]. I verified that it
applies cleanly against the gcc-9-branch (with the exception of the
ChangeLog changes), and that tests complete successfully on Linux
x86_64. There are no target dependencies involved in this change.
Tom.
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88095
[2]: http://wg21.link/p1423
[3]: http://wg21.link/p1423#emulate
[4]: http://wg21.link/p0482
[5]: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=274123
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release
2019-08-08 14:49 Tom Honermann
@ 2019-08-08 15:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2019-08-08 15:57 ` Tom Honermann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2019-08-08 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Honermann; +Cc: gcc, Jason Merrill
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:49:41AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
> > Status
> > ======
> >
> > The first 9.2 release candidate has been released.
> > The GCC 9 branch is frozen for preparation of the GCC 9.2 release.
> > All changes to the branch now require release manager approval.
>
> Hi, Jakub. If at all possible, I'd like to request that a back port of PR
> c++/88095 [1] be included in the gcc 9.2 release.
I'd prefer to defer it for 9.2.1 (i.e. commit after Monday next week),
the fix has been on the trunk only for 3 days and would require another
release candidate, plus it isn't really a regression.
That way if it breaks something we have several months
to discover it and fix it.
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release
2019-08-08 15:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2019-08-08 15:57 ` Tom Honermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Honermann @ 2019-08-08 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: gcc, Jason Merrill
On 8/8/19 11:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:49:41AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
>>> Status
>>> ======
>>>
>>> The first 9.2 release candidate has been released.
>>> The GCC 9 branch is frozen for preparation of the GCC 9.2 release.
>>> All changes to the branch now require release manager approval.
>> Hi, Jakub. If at all possible, I'd like to request that a back port of PR
>> c++/88095 [1] be included in the gcc 9.2 release.
> I'd prefer to defer it for 9.2.1 (i.e. commit after Monday next week),
> the fix has been on the trunk only for 3 days and would require another
> release candidate, plus it isn't really a regression.
>
> That way if it breaks something we have several months
> to discover it and fix it.
I'm content with that. Thanks, Jakub.
Tom.
>
> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-08 15:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-05 13:22 GCC 9.2 Status Report (2019-08-05), branch frozen for release Jakub Jelinek
2019-08-05 17:03 ` Martin Sebor
2019-08-06 7:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2019-08-08 14:49 Tom Honermann
2019-08-08 15:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2019-08-08 15:57 ` Tom Honermann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).