public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* GCC 8.5 Status Report (2021-04-23)
@ 2021-04-23 11:55 Jakub Jelinek
  2021-04-23 21:24 ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2021-04-23 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc; +Cc: Nathan Sidwell, Jason Merrill

Status
======

GCC 8.5 release and closing of the 8 branch is several months overdue,
we don't have enough time to maintain trunk and 4 supported release branches.
Therefore, I'd like to do 8.5-rc1 on 7th of May and release 8.5 and close
the branch a week after that.
We have one P1 bug though - P98358 - it is unclear if just changing the
testcase is all that is needed or if some C++ FE changes are needed.
If anyone has anything to backport to 8.5, please do so in the upcoming 2
weeks.  Thanks.


Quality Data
============

Priority          #   Change from last report
--------        ---   -----------------------
P1                1
P2              287   +  28
P3               32   -   2
P4              152   -   3
P5               21   -   1
--------        ---   -----------------------
Total P1-P3     320   +  26
Total           493   +  22


Previous Report
===============

https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2020-03/msg00043.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: GCC 8.5 Status Report (2021-04-23)
  2021-04-23 11:55 GCC 8.5 Status Report (2021-04-23) Jakub Jelinek
@ 2021-04-23 21:24 ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2021-04-23 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: gcc Mailing List, Nathan Sidwell

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 7:55 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Status
> ======
>
> GCC 8.5 release and closing of the 8 branch is several months overdue,
> we don't have enough time to maintain trunk and 4 supported release branches.
> Therefore, I'd like to do 8.5-rc1 on 7th of May and release 8.5 and close
> the branch a week after that.
> We have one P1 bug though - P98358 - it is unclear if just changing the
> testcase is all that is needed or if some C++ FE changes are needed.

The error message quoted in the PR looks correct, so I think changing
the testcase is sufficient.

> If anyone has anything to backport to 8.5, please do so in the upcoming 2
> weeks.  Thanks.
>
>
> Quality Data
> ============
>
> Priority          #   Change from last report
> --------        ---   -----------------------
> P1                1
> P2              287   +  28
> P3               32   -   2
> P4              152   -   3
> P5               21   -   1
> --------        ---   -----------------------
> Total P1-P3     320   +  26
> Total           493   +  22
>
>
> Previous Report
> ===============
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2020-03/msg00043.html
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-23 21:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-23 11:55 GCC 8.5 Status Report (2021-04-23) Jakub Jelinek
2021-04-23 21:24 ` Jason Merrill

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).