From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Umesh Kalappa <umesh.kalappa0@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul E Murphy <murphyp@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Passing the complex args in the GPR's
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 11:42:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230606164256.GQ19790@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfacvQ84ZexaH3Wgdz-vL3Y2MkKEtqqMg_jOZ15++rhNvZuXA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 08:35:22PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> Hi Adnrew,
> Thank you for the quick response and for PPC64 too ,we do have
> mismatches in ABI b/w complex operations like
> https://godbolt.org/z/bjsYovx4c .
>
> Any reason why GCC chose to use GPR 's here ?
What did you expect, what happened instead? Why did you expect that,
and why then is it an error what did happen?
You used -O0. As long as the code works, all is fine. But unoptimised
code frequently is hard to read, please use -O2 instead?
As Andrew says, why did you use -m32 for GCC but -m64 for LLVM? It is
hard to compare those at all! 32-bit PowerPC Linux ABI (based on 32-bit
PowerPC ELF ABI from 1995, BE version) vs. 64-bit ELFv2 ABI from 2015
(LE version).
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-24 9:38 [PATCH Linux] powerpc: add documentation for HWCAPs Nicholas Piggin
2022-05-24 9:52 ` Florian Weimer
2022-05-24 18:32 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-15 1:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-07-15 14:35 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-05-24 17:38 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-07-15 1:00 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-06-06 14:49 ` Passing the complex args in the GPR's Umesh Kalappa
2023-06-06 14:58 ` Andrew Pinski
2023-06-06 15:05 ` Umesh Kalappa
2023-06-06 15:16 ` Andrew Pinski
2023-06-06 16:42 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2023-06-06 17:07 ` Umesh Kalappa
2023-06-06 17:33 ` David Edelsohn
2023-06-07 13:17 ` Michael Matz
2023-06-06 17:18 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230606164256.GQ19790@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=murphyp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=umesh.kalappa0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).