* Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
@ 2003-05-21 20:57 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-21 21:01 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-05-21 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin, gcc
Daniel,
this is kind of urgent since I think not only I am drowning in mails that
I don't know whether I want to read: when bugzilla sends out messages, it
gives the PR number as in [Bug XXXX]. But it doesn't say the category any
more. I can impossibly look into each of them, I'm basically only
interested in the ones for C++, so we really need that bugzilla prints
something like
[Bug c++/XXXX] some description
as mail header, or maybe even shorter (as previously):
Re: c++/XXXX: ...
Can you do that? The volume on gcc-bugs is just too high...
Thanks
Wolfgang
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
2003-05-21 20:57 Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header Wolfgang Bangerth
@ 2003-05-21 21:01 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-21 21:20 ` Christian Ehrhardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-21 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Bangerth; +Cc: gcc
On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 04:41 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> Daniel,
> this is kind of urgent since I think not only I am drowning in mails
> that
> I don't know whether I want to read:
> when bugzilla sends out messages, it
> gives the PR number as in [Bug XXXX]. But it doesn't say the category
> any
> more. I can impossibly look into each of them, I'm basically only
> interested in the ones for C++, so we really need that bugzilla prints
> something like
> [Bug c++/XXXX] some description
> as mail header, or maybe even shorter (as previously):
> Re: c++/XXXX: ...
>
> Can you do that?
I've done the first.
> The volume on gcc-bugs is just too high...
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
2003-05-21 21:01 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-05-21 21:20 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-21 21:37 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-23 19:57 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Ehrhardt @ 2003-05-21 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Berlin; +Cc: Wolfgang Bangerth, gcc
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:57:06PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 04:41 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> >I can impossibly look into each of them, I'm basically only
> >interested in the ones for C++, so we really need that bugzilla prints
> >something like
> > [Bug c++/XXXX] some description
> >as mail header, or maybe even shorter (as previously):
> > Re: c++/XXXX: ...
> >
> >Can you do that?
> I've done the first.
I'd really appreciate Subjects starting with ``Re:'' for any
replies/changes to Bug-reports. Also some kind of "References:" or
"In-reply-to:" header for use with mailreaders that support threading
would be really heplful. Is this easilzy doable?
Thanks for all the work you're doing with bugzilla.
regards Christian
--
THAT'S ALL FOLKS!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
2003-05-21 21:20 ` Christian Ehrhardt
@ 2003-05-21 21:37 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-23 19:57 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-21 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Ehrhardt; +Cc: Wolfgang Bangerth, gcc
On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 05:12 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:57:06PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 04:41 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>>> I can impossibly look into each of them, I'm basically only
>>> interested in the ones for C++, so we really need that bugzilla
>>> prints
>>> something like
>>> [Bug c++/XXXX] some description
>>> as mail header, or maybe even shorter (as previously):
>>> Re: c++/XXXX: ...
>>>
>>> Can you do that?
>> I've done the first.
>
> I'd really appreciate Subjects starting with ``Re:'' for any
> replies/changes to Bug-reports.
I'll look into it.
> Also some kind of "References:" or
> "In-reply-to:" header for use with mailreaders that support threading
> would be really heplful. Is this easilzy doable?
>
Not quite yet.
See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31314
I'll get to it eventually.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
2003-05-21 21:20 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-21 21:37 ` Daniel Berlin
@ 2003-05-23 19:57 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-23 20:56 ` Daniel Berlin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-05-23 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Ehrhardt; +Cc: Daniel Berlin, gcc
> > >something like
> > > [Bug c++/XXXX] some description
> > >as mail header, or maybe even shorter (as previously):
> > > Re: c++/XXXX: ...
> > >
> > >Can you do that?
> > I've done the first.
>
> I'd really appreciate Subjects starting with ``Re:'' for any
> replies/changes to Bug-reports.
Indeed. I realized that we use brackets [...] to indicate other stuff in
the subject line (no flames, please, that's just the way it is presently),
and that's kind of hidden now because bugzilla also uses [Bug XXXX] now.
How hard would it be to change back to
Re: c++/XXXX
?
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header
2003-05-23 19:57 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
@ 2003-05-23 20:56 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2003-05-23 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Bangerth; +Cc: Christian Ehrhardt, gcc
On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 03:56 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
>>>> something like
>>>> [Bug c++/XXXX] some description
>>>> as mail header, or maybe even shorter (as previously):
>>>> Re: c++/XXXX: ...
>>>>
>>>> Can you do that?
>>> I've done the first.
>>
>> I'd really appreciate Subjects starting with ``Re:'' for any
>> replies/changes to Bug-reports.
>
> Indeed. I realized that we use brackets [...] to indicate other stuff
> in
> the subject line (no flames, please, that's just the way it is
> presently),
> and that's kind of hidden now because bugzilla also uses [Bug XXXX]
> now.
> How hard would it be to change back to
> Re: c++/XXXX
I can do this, if nobody objects.
--Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-23 20:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-21 20:57 Bugzilla doesn't print category in mail header Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-21 21:01 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-21 21:20 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2003-05-21 21:37 ` Daniel Berlin
2003-05-23 19:57 ` Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-23 20:56 ` Daniel Berlin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).