* Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
@ 2009-06-10 8:11 Dennis Clarke
2009-06-10 20:30 ` Tom Christensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Clarke @ 2009-06-10 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Christensen; +Cc: dclarke, gcc
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
>>
>> I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw
>> that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen.
>>
>> All GCC 4.3.3 reports on Solaris from one person :
>>
>
> You better get cracking on 4.4.0 aswell since I posted most of those
> reports too ;)
no rest for the weary .. you have been very busy indeed.
How did you do with the new PPL bits ? That went smoothly ?
>> I think it is great we have any report at all but for the sake of
>> diversity and some comparison data I'll add mine in there :
>>
> More testresults are always welcome.
I think a few datapoints are always better than one. Tough to plot a trend
or do comparison with one datapoint.
>> Results for 4.3.3 (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-06/msg00501.html
>>
> Thank you.
>
>> I'll get the i386 reports later this week.
>>
> Sounds good.
>
> The testresults will be added with the next round of updates which I
> plan to do early next week.
>
cool :-)
Dennis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
2009-06-10 8:11 Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html Dennis Clarke
@ 2009-06-10 20:30 ` Tom Christensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Christensen @ 2009-06-10 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dclarke; +Cc: gcc
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> How did you do with the new PPL bits ? That went smoothly ?
>
They're not mandatory for 4.4.x so I've simply ignored them for now.
-tgc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
@ 2009-06-11 1:44 Dennis Clarke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Clarke @ 2009-06-11 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Christensen; +Cc: dclarke, gcc
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > How did you do with the new PPL bits ? That went smoothly ?
>>
> They're not mandatory for 4.4.x so I've simply ignored them for now.
ah .. how very tricky of you :-)
Dennis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
2009-06-08 17:41 Dennis Clarke
@ 2009-06-10 5:45 ` Tom Christensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Christensen @ 2009-06-10 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dclarke; +Cc: gcc
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
>
> I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw
> that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen.
>
> All GCC 4.3.3 reports on Solaris from one person :
>
You better get cracking on 4.4.0 aswell since I posted most of those
reports too ;)
> I think it is great we have any report at all but for the sake of
> diversity and some comparison data I'll add mine in there :
>
More testresults are always welcome.
> Results for 4.3.3 (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-06/msg00501.html
>
Thank you.
> I'll get the i386 reports later this week.
>
Sounds good.
The testresults will be added with the next round of updates which I
plan to do early next week.
-tgc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
@ 2009-06-08 17:41 Dennis Clarke
2009-06-10 5:45 ` Tom Christensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Clarke @ 2009-06-08 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw
that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen.
All GCC 4.3.3 reports on Solaris from one person :
i386-pc-solaris2.6 Test results: 4.3.3
i386-pc-solaris2.8 Test results: 4.3.3
i386-pc-solaris2.9 Test results: 4.3.3
i386-pc-solaris2.10 Test results: 4.3.3
sparc-sun-solaris2.6 Test results: 4.3.3
sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Test results: 4.3.3
sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Test results: 4.3.3
I think it is great we have any report at all but for the sake of
diversity and some comparison data I'll add mine in there :
Results for 4.3.3 (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-06/msg00501.html
I'll get the i386 reports later this week.
--
Dennis Clarke
http://www.blastwave.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-11 1:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-10 8:11 Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html Dennis Clarke
2009-06-10 20:30 ` Tom Christensen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-11 1:44 Dennis Clarke
2009-06-08 17:41 Dennis Clarke
2009-06-10 5:45 ` Tom Christensen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).