* FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
[not found] <258866171.579.1489773600679.JavaMail.jenkins@blackduck>
@ 2017-03-17 18:39 ` Pinski, Andrew
2017-03-17 18:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pinski, Andrew @ 2017-03-17 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc; +Cc: law, bschmidt
One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on aarch64-linux-gnu:
r246225
r246226
r246227
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Ignore the URLs in the log file below, this is a Jenkins to Cavium.
-----Original Message-----
From: jenkins@cavium.com [mailto:jenkins@cavium.com]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 11:00 AM
To: Pinski, Andrew <Andrew.Pinski@cavium.com>
Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
------------------------------------------
rm -f stage_current
make[3]: Leaving directory '<http://toolchain-releases.caveonetworks.com:8080/job/BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream/ws/objdir'>
Comparing stages 2 and 3
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/lto/lto.o differs
libcpp/line-map.o differs
Makefile:24072: recipe for target 'compare' failed
make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '<http://toolchain-releases.caveonetworks.com:8080/job/BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream/ws/objdir'>
Makefile:24051: recipe for target 'stage3-bubble' failed
make[1]: *** [stage3-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '<http://toolchain-releases.caveonetworks.com:8080/job/BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream/ws/objdir'>
Makefile:931: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
[WARNINGS] Skipping publisher since build result is FAILURE
Archiving artifacts
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
2017-03-17 18:39 ` FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267 Pinski, Andrew
@ 2017-03-17 18:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
2017-03-17 19:33 ` Jeff Law
2017-03-17 21:31 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bernd Schmidt @ 2017-03-17 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pinski, Andrew, gcc; +Cc: law
On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
> One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on aarch64-linux-gnu:
> r246225
> r246226
> r246227
Can you help narrow that down?
Bernd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
2017-03-17 18:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
@ 2017-03-17 19:33 ` Jeff Law
2017-03-17 21:31 ` Andrew Pinski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2017-03-17 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bernd Schmidt, Pinski, Andrew, gcc
On 03/17/2017 12:47 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>> One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
>> aarch64-linux-gnu:
>> r246225
>> r246226
>> r246227
>
> Can you help narrow that down?
I'm provisioning an aarch64 system now.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
2017-03-17 18:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
2017-03-17 19:33 ` Jeff Law
@ 2017-03-17 21:31 ` Andrew Pinski
2017-03-17 22:28 ` Jeff Law
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2017-03-17 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bernd Schmidt; +Cc: Pinski, Andrew, gcc, law
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>
>> One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
>> aarch64-linux-gnu:
>> r246225
>> r246226
>> r246227
>
>
> Can you help narrow that down?
I can though I don't want to duplicate work since Jeff was going to
provision an aarch64 system. My automated testing is approximately
every hour or so; these commits were within an hour window even.
I did not look into the revisions when I write the email but I suspect
r246227 did NOT cause it since aarch64 does not use reload anymore.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
>
> Bernd
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
2017-03-17 21:31 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2017-03-17 22:28 ` Jeff Law
2017-03-17 23:12 ` Jim Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2017-03-17 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Pinski, Bernd Schmidt; +Cc: Pinski, Andrew, gcc
On 03/17/2017 03:31 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>>
>>> One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
>>> aarch64-linux-gnu:
>>> r246225
>>> r246226
>>> r246227
>>
>>
>> Can you help narrow that down?
>
> I can though I don't want to duplicate work since Jeff was going to
> provision an aarch64 system. My automated testing is approximately
> every hour or so; these commits were within an hour window even.
> I did not look into the revisions when I write the email but I suspect
> r246227 did NOT cause it since aarch64 does not use reload anymore.
My the box I got isn't terribly fast, but regardless I'll be walking
through each commit to see if I can trigger the failure.
246224 tested OK (as it should).
246225 is in progress.
jeff
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
2017-03-17 22:28 ` Jeff Law
@ 2017-03-17 23:12 ` Jim Wilson
2017-03-17 23:51 ` Jim Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jim Wilson @ 2017-03-17 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Law, Andrew Pinski, Bernd Schmidt; +Cc: Pinski, Andrew, gcc
On 03/17/2017 03:28 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 03:31 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 03/17/2017 07:38 PM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>>>
>>>> One of the following revision caused a bootstrap comparison failure on
>>>> aarch64-linux-gnu:
>>>> r246225
>>>> r246226
>>>> r246227
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you help narrow that down?
>>
>> I can though I don't want to duplicate work since Jeff was going to
>> provision an aarch64 system. My automated testing is approximately
>> every hour or so; these commits were within an hour window even.
>> I did not look into the revisions when I write the email but I suspect
>> r246227 did NOT cause it since aarch64 does not use reload anymore.
> My the box I got isn't terribly fast, but regardless I'll be walking
> through each commit to see if I can trigger the failure.
>
> 246224 tested OK (as it should).
>
> 246225 is in progress.
I have access to a fast box that isn't otherwise in use at the moment so
I'm taking a look. r246225 builds OK. r246226 does not. So it is
Bernd's combine patch. A little experimenting shows that the compare
difference is triggered by the use of -gtoggle in stage2, which is not
used in stage3. Otherwise stage2 and stage3 generate identical code.
The bug is apparently due to a problem with handling debug insns in the
combine patch.
Jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
2017-03-17 23:12 ` Jim Wilson
@ 2017-03-17 23:51 ` Jim Wilson
2017-03-18 1:32 ` Jeff Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jim Wilson @ 2017-03-17 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Law, Andrew Pinski, Bernd Schmidt; +Cc: Pinski, Andrew, gcc
On 03/17/2017 04:12 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> I have access to a fast box that isn't otherwise in use at the moment so
> I'm taking a look. r246225 builds OK. r246226 does not. So it is
> Bernd's combine patch. A little experimenting shows that the compare
> difference is triggered by the use of -gtoggle in stage2, which is not
> used in stage3. Otherwise stage2 and stage3 generate identical code.
> The bug is apparently due to a problem with handling debug insns in the
> combine patch.
Changing a new prev_nonnote_insn call to a prev_nonnote_nondebug_insn
call appears to solve the problem. I will have to do a bootstrap and
make check from scratch to verify. I also noticed that there is a
redundant i1 check in the patch which should be fixed also.
Jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267
2017-03-17 23:51 ` Jim Wilson
@ 2017-03-18 1:32 ` Jeff Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2017-03-18 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Wilson, Andrew Pinski, Bernd Schmidt; +Cc: Pinski, Andrew, gcc
On 03/17/2017 05:51 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 04:12 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
>> I have access to a fast box that isn't otherwise in use at the moment so
>> I'm taking a look. r246225 builds OK. r246226 does not. So it is
>> Bernd's combine patch. A little experimenting shows that the compare
>> difference is triggered by the use of -gtoggle in stage2, which is not
>> used in stage3. Otherwise stage2 and stage3 generate identical code.
>> The bug is apparently due to a problem with handling debug insns in the
>> combine patch.
>
> Changing a new prev_nonnote_insn call to a prev_nonnote_nondebug_insn
> call appears to solve the problem. I will have to do a bootstrap and
> make check from scratch to verify. I also noticed that there is a
> redundant i1 check in the patch which should be fixed also.
Thanks Jim. My 246226 was just spinning up.
Consider your fixes pre-approved.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-18 1:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <258866171.579.1489773600679.JavaMail.jenkins@blackduck>
2017-03-17 18:39 ` FW: Build failed in Jenkins: BuildThunderX_native_gcc_upstream #1267 Pinski, Andrew
2017-03-17 18:48 ` Bernd Schmidt
2017-03-17 19:33 ` Jeff Law
2017-03-17 21:31 ` Andrew Pinski
2017-03-17 22:28 ` Jeff Law
2017-03-17 23:12 ` Jim Wilson
2017-03-17 23:51 ` Jim Wilson
2017-03-18 1:32 ` Jeff Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).