From: Frank Scheiner <frank.scheiner@web.de>
To: "Peter Bergner" <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
"Richard Biener" <rguenther@suse.de>,
"René Rebe" <rene@exactcode.de>
Cc: GCC Administrator via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, jeffreyalaw@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Stepping up as maintainer for ia64
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 23:31:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67244113-4ebd-4ef7-aad3-dd3593cda532@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7928dec0-4ea2-4707-80c4-e07c86d35eb1@linux.ibm.com>
On 08.03.24 23:00, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>> I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal
>> though I guess this will not go forward as a first step. Instead
>> you are probably expected to show activity on the port, for example
>> post the patch series to make ia64 use LRA, get write access to the
>> git repository and then be promoted maintainer.
>
> One other method for showing activity is posting regular testsuite
> results on the gcc-testresults mailing list to show the community
> the port is "working".
I don't want to spam this or the other list each and every week, but I
am since a while cross-compiling each Linux mainline RC and release with
the latest gcc-14 snapshot available each time and test the result on a
variety of real machines and on the HP Sim platform in Ski (since
recently). And since doing that I haven't seen any new ICEs since I
reported [1].
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111425
Something similar is done automatically for the Linux stable RC and
releases but with a fixed gcc-13.2.0 cross-compiler (provided by Arnd
Bergmann on [2]) on GitHub, including a test run in Ski, see for example
[3].
[2]: https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
[3]:
https://github.com/johnny-mnemonic/linux-stable-rc/actions/runs/8198165399
Both are surely not as extensive as a testsuite run, but give a good
preview I think: it's working for what we are doing with these machines,
thanks for asking.
Cheers,
Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-07 17:52 René Rebe
2024-03-07 19:08 ` Richard Biener
2024-03-08 8:54 ` René Rebe
2024-03-08 13:16 ` Richard Biener
2024-03-08 22:00 ` Peter Bergner
2024-03-08 22:31 ` Frank Scheiner [this message]
2024-03-08 23:28 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-03-09 2:18 ` Peter Bergner
2024-03-09 17:08 ` Frank Scheiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67244113-4ebd-4ef7-aad3-dd3593cda532@web.de \
--to=frank.scheiner@web.de \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=rene@exactcode.de \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).