public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Scheiner <frank.scheiner@web.de>
To: "Peter Bergner" <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Richard Biener" <rguenther@suse.de>,
	"René Rebe" <rene@exactcode.de>
Cc: GCC Administrator via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, jeffreyalaw@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Stepping up as maintainer for ia64
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 23:31:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67244113-4ebd-4ef7-aad3-dd3593cda532@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7928dec0-4ea2-4707-80c4-e07c86d35eb1@linux.ibm.com>

On 08.03.24 23:00, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>> I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal
>> though I guess this will not go forward as a first step.  Instead
>> you are probably expected to show activity on the port, for example
>> post the patch series to make ia64 use LRA, get write access to the
>> git repository and then be promoted maintainer.
>
> One other method for showing activity is posting regular testsuite
> results on the gcc-testresults mailing list to show the community
> the port is "working".

I don't want to spam this or the other list each and every week, but I
am since a while cross-compiling each Linux mainline RC and release with
the latest gcc-14 snapshot available each time and test the result on a
variety of real machines and on the HP Sim platform in Ski (since
recently). And since doing that I haven't seen any new ICEs since I
reported [1].

[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111425

Something similar is done automatically for the Linux stable RC and
releases but with a fixed gcc-13.2.0 cross-compiler (provided by Arnd
Bergmann on [2]) on GitHub, including a test run in Ski, see for example
[3].

[2]: https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

[3]:
https://github.com/johnny-mnemonic/linux-stable-rc/actions/runs/8198165399

Both are surely not as extensive as a testsuite run, but give a good
preview I think: it's working for what we are doing with these machines,
thanks for asking.

Cheers,
Frank

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-08 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-07 17:52 René Rebe
2024-03-07 19:08 ` Richard Biener
2024-03-08  8:54   ` René Rebe
2024-03-08 13:16     ` Richard Biener
2024-03-08 22:00       ` Peter Bergner
2024-03-08 22:31         ` Frank Scheiner [this message]
2024-03-08 23:28           ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-03-09  2:18             ` Peter Bergner
2024-03-09 17:08               ` Frank Scheiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67244113-4ebd-4ef7-aad3-dd3593cda532@web.de \
    --to=frank.scheiner@web.de \
    --cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=rene@exactcode.de \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).