public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
To: Eric Batchelor <eric@bookmanager.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Expected warning maybe-uninitialized does not appear using g++13.2.0?
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 22:43:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c605c042acb7ea3de38fdb7f953969a1560fd19.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31bdc2a5-3556-4ccb-8a91-723ccd71652c@bookmanager.com>

On Wed, 2023-12-20 at 11:16 -0800, Eric Batchelor wrote:
> Hello, I unintentionally stumbled upon some strange behaviour that 
> occurred due to a typo.
> I reproduced the behaviour where an object (std::string in my case)
> can 
> be passed to a function by reference, uninitialized, WITHOUT a
> compiler 
> warning.
> Changing the code to pass the object by value DOES emit the warning.
> I don't think the compiled code is incorrect, it segfaults presumably
> due to uninitialized members.
> I understand there may seldom be a reason to use uninitialized
> objects, 
> so "don't do that," but as I said this was unintentional and it seems
> that it should have generated a warning, which have saved some 
> head-scratching.
> 
> Code to reproduce:
> 
> #include <string>
> std::string f(std::string &s) {
>    s.append("x");
>    return s;
> }
> int main() {
>    std::string a = f(a);
> }
> 
> Compile and run (no warning):
> 
> $ g++ -o uninit_obj uninit_obj.cpp -std=c++23 -Wall -Wpedantic -
> Wextra 
> && ./uninit_obj
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> 
> No difference whether using -O0 (or 1 2 3)

As I understand it, -Wmaybe-uninitialized is purely intraprocedural
i.e. it works within each individual function, without considering the
interactions *between* functions.

FWIW, -fanalyzer does attempt to model interprocedural interactions,
but doesn't yet work properly on C++ code.  For your example, it
happens to generate some warnings, but the wording is really vague;
see: https://godbolt.org/z/a1q7xYMjb
and it might well be getting other things wrong (as I said, it doesn't
yet properly work on C++).

Dave


> 
> If I change the function to pass by value, std::string f(std::string
> s), 
> and rerun, I get the expected compiler warning:
> 
> $ g++ -o uninit_obj uninit_obj.cpp -std=c++23 -Wall -Wpedantic -
> Wextra 
> && ./uninit_obj
> uninit_obj.cpp: In function 'int main()':
> uninit_obj.cpp:7:22: warning: 'a' may be used uninitialized 
> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>      7 |   std::string a = f(a);
> [...]
> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
>    what():  std::bad_alloc
> Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> Output from g++ -v:
> 
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=g++
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc13/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-
> gnu/13.2.0/lto-wrapper
> Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../gcc-13.2.0/configure --disable-multilib 
> --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/local/gcc13 --program-suffix=-
> 13 
> --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes
> Thread model: posix
> Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
> gcc version 13.2.0 (GCC)
> 
> Thanks
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-22  3:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-20 19:16 Eric Batchelor
2023-12-22  3:43 ` David Malcolm [this message]
2023-12-22  4:45   ` Marc Glisse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c605c042acb7ea3de38fdb7f953969a1560fd19.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric@bookmanager.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).