* Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X
@ 2004-12-06 15:14 The Doctor
2004-12-06 17:26 ` Janis Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: The Doctor @ 2004-12-06 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Has anyone done this successfully?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Merry Christmas 2004 and Happy New Year 2005
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X
2004-12-06 15:14 Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X The Doctor
@ 2004-12-06 17:26 ` Janis Johnson
2004-12-06 19:14 ` The Doctor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Janis Johnson @ 2004-12-06 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The Doctor; +Cc: gcc
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:13:36AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> Has anyone done this successfully?
You haven't said which BSD or which target, but see the GCC build status
lists referenced from http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html for links to
reports of successful bootstraps of GCC on various platforms. There are
reports for FreeBSD 4.6 through 5.2, NetBSD 1.5.3 through 2.0, and
OpenBSD 3.1 and 3.3.
Janis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X
2004-12-06 17:26 ` Janis Johnson
@ 2004-12-06 19:14 ` The Doctor
2004-12-10 1:12 ` Joe Buck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: The Doctor @ 2004-12-06 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Janis Johnson; +Cc: gcc
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:26:36AM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:13:36AM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > Has anyone done this successfully?
>
> You haven't said which BSD or which target, but see the GCC build status
> lists referenced from http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html for links to
> reports of successful bootstraps of GCC on various platforms. There are
> reports for FreeBSD 4.6 through 5.2, NetBSD 1.5.3 through 2.0, and
> OpenBSD 3.1 and 3.3.
>
I said BSD/OS 4.3.X
BSD/OS 4.3.X comes with gcc 2.95.2
BSD/OS 5.1 comes with gcc 3.2
BSD/OS 5.1 is a development disaster.
Question again has anyone ported GCC 3.4.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X successfully?
> Janis
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Merry Christmas 2004 and Happy New Year 2005
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X
2004-12-06 19:14 ` The Doctor
@ 2004-12-10 1:12 ` Joe Buck
2004-12-10 3:03 ` The Doctor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2004-12-10 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The Doctor; +Cc: Janis Johnson, gcc
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:13:51PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> I said BSD/OS 4.3.X
>
> BSD/OS 4.3.X comes with gcc 2.95.2
>
> BSD/OS 5.1 comes with gcc 3.2
>
> BSD/OS 5.1 is a development disaster.
>
> Question again has anyone ported GCC 3.4.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X successfully?
Probably not; it's pretty much a dead OS, both proprietary and
discontinued. Only old BSDi customers who still have support can get
it, apparently.
For background on the end of BSD/OS, see
http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/2003/09/News105.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X
2004-12-10 1:12 ` Joe Buck
@ 2004-12-10 3:03 ` The Doctor
2004-12-10 10:29 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: The Doctor @ 2004-12-10 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Buck; +Cc: Janis Johnson, gcc
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 05:12:42PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:13:51PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
> > I said BSD/OS 4.3.X
> >
> > BSD/OS 4.3.X comes with gcc 2.95.2
> >
> > BSD/OS 5.1 comes with gcc 3.2
> >
> > BSD/OS 5.1 is a development disaster.
> >
> > Question again has anyone ported GCC 3.4.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X successfully?
>
> Probably not; it's pretty much a dead OS, both proprietary and
> discontinued. Only old BSDi customers who still have support can get
> it, apparently.
>
> For background on the end of BSD/OS, see
>
> http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/2003/09/News105.html
Proprietary?? I am still using it. WRS wil stop
support at the end of the month.
Still I did try to port it, got mutt to work
but not INN nor Openssl.
--
Member - Liberal International
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Merry Christmas 2004 and Happy New Year 2005
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X
2004-12-10 3:03 ` The Doctor
@ 2004-12-10 10:29 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2004-12-10 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The Doctor; +Cc: Joe Buck, Janis Johnson, gcc
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, The Doctor wrote:
>> Probably not; it's pretty much a dead OS, both proprietary and
>> discontinued. Only old BSDi customers who still have support can get
>> it, apparently.
> Proprietary?? I am still using it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software
Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-10 10:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-06 15:14 Porting GCC 3.X to BSD/OS 4.3.X The Doctor
2004-12-06 17:26 ` Janis Johnson
2004-12-06 19:14 ` The Doctor
2004-12-10 1:12 ` Joe Buck
2004-12-10 3:03 ` The Doctor
2004-12-10 10:29 ` Gerald Pfeifer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).