* [dj@delorie.com: Results for 4.4.0 20080612 (experimental) [trunk revision 136692] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]
@ 2008-06-12 18:50 DJ Delorie
2008-06-14 0:26 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2008-06-12 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
I should start posting these to the testing list. Lots of m16c
improvements, but some m32c regressions. I haven't tried to diagnose
these yet, but if nobody claims it's their fault I will ;-)
Anyone know why the regressions happened?
DJ
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:01:34 -0400
From: DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com>
To: dj@redhat.com
Subject: Results for 4.4.0 20080612 (experimental) [trunk revision 136692] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf
gcc result changes...
Multilib: m32c-sim/-mcpu=m16c
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/pr23484-chk.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/pr23484-chk.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/pr23484-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/pr23484-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/pr23484-chk.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20030626-2.c execution, -O0
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-8.c execution, -O0
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-8.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-8.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-8.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-8.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-8.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-9.c execution, -O0
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-9.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-9.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-9.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-9.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-9.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920726-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920726-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920726-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920726-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920726-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920726-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920726-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/920726-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/930513-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/930513-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/930513-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/930513-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/930513-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/930513-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-21.c execution, -O0
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/920810-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/920810-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/920810-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/920810-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/920810-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL-PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/920810-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL-PASS: gcc.dg/alias-11.c execution test
Multilib: m32c-sim/-mcpu=m32c
PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
g++ result changes...
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jun 12 06:02:39 UTC 2008 (revision 136692)
Target is m32c-unknown-elf
Host is i686-pc-linux-gnu
------- End of forwarded message -------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dj@delorie.com: Results for 4.4.0 20080612 (experimental) [trunk revision 136692] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]
2008-06-12 18:50 [dj@delorie.com: Results for 4.4.0 20080612 (experimental) [trunk revision 136692] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf] DJ Delorie
@ 2008-06-14 0:26 ` DJ Delorie
2008-06-14 21:57 ` Richard Guenther
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2008-06-14 0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Guenther; +Cc: gcc
> I should start posting these to the testing list. Lots of m16c
> improvements, but some m32c regressions. I haven't tried to diagnose
> these yet, but if nobody claims it's their fault I will ;-)
>
> Anyone know why the regressions happened?
>
> PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
> PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
> PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
FYI I tracked this down to this patch (r136679):
2008-06-11 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
* alias.c (get_alias_set): Use the element alias-set for arrays.
(record_component_aliases): For arrays and vectors do nothing.
* c-common.c (strict_aliasing_warning): Handle the cases
of alias set zero explicitly.
* Makefile.in (dfp.o-warn): Add -Wno-error.
Before the patch, -mcpu=m16c had execute failures for this test.
After, -mcpu=m32c had execute failures. The problem is in the way
newlib is compiled, not the test case itself.
Richard, do you want me to try to track this down further, or is this
enough for you to figure out what's happening?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dj@delorie.com: Results for 4.4.0 20080612 (experimental) [trunk revision 136692] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf]
2008-06-14 0:26 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2008-06-14 21:57 ` Richard Guenther
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Guenther @ 2008-06-14 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: DJ Delorie; +Cc: gcc
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > I should start posting these to the testing list. Lots of m16c
> > improvements, but some m32c regressions. I haven't tried to diagnose
> > these yet, but if nobody claims it's their fault I will ;-)
> >
> > Anyone know why the regressions happened?
> >
> > PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> > PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
> > PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
> > PASS-FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -O3 -g
>
> FYI I tracked this down to this patch (r136679):
>
> 2008-06-11 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
>
> * alias.c (get_alias_set): Use the element alias-set for arrays.
> (record_component_aliases): For arrays and vectors do nothing.
> * c-common.c (strict_aliasing_warning): Handle the cases
> of alias set zero explicitly.
> * Makefile.in (dfp.o-warn): Add -Wno-error.
>
> Before the patch, -mcpu=m16c had execute failures for this test.
> After, -mcpu=m32c had execute failures. The problem is in the way
> newlib is compiled, not the test case itself.
>
> Richard, do you want me to try to track this down further, or is this
> enough for you to figure out what's happening?
I won't be able to look at this, so any help is appreciated.
Richard.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-14 21:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-06-12 18:50 [dj@delorie.com: Results for 4.4.0 20080612 (experimental) [trunk revision 136692] (GCC) testsuite on m32c-unknown-elf] DJ Delorie
2008-06-14 0:26 ` DJ Delorie
2008-06-14 21:57 ` Richard Guenther
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).