* Re: OMPD Copyright
2022-05-19 18:35 OMPD Copyright Mohamed Atef
@ 2022-05-19 19:20 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2022-05-19 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mohamed Atef; +Cc: gcc, Martin Jambor
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 08:35:43PM +0200, Mohamed Atef wrote:
> Can OMPD be under our university Copyright?
> The project is a university project.
When you use DCO, your contribution will be under the copyright
of whomever owns the copyright to it (you or your university etc.),
but we really don't want to list on every file a Copyright line
for whomever touched that file. The FSF Copyright lines are there
in most of the files because those files were added by people with
Copyright assignment to FSF, but the alternative to that is really
Copyright The GNU Toolchain Authors.
(without year), which just says that the file is copyrighted and
isn't something that needs to be updated every second day somebody
touches the file and changes something in it.
There is quite significant cost in accepting any other Copyright line
form, we have a script to bump the FSF Copyright years and it gives up
on any unknown copyright lines. We've made some exceptions for
files that have been copied from other projects and where those files
already had some copyright lines in some cases, but we really don't
want to do that for files which are hosted only in GCC and don't
come from other projects. See contrib/update-copyright.py.
We will need to add hopefully just a single line next year
for the 'The GNU Toolchain Authors.' or perhaps 2-3 if there are
variant spellings of that, but if every contributor under DCO
asks for his copyright lines, it would be a nightmare. Furthermore,
usually people don't update copyright lines when touching existing
files, so if the file contained your or your university copyright
line and no other and somebody else changes the file, it wouldn't
reflect correctly the copyright state.
See e.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/r12-6635 for an example of such a file
which has been added under DCO, even when it is Jonathan or Red Hat
(who exactly owns copyright is extremely country and contract
specific) who actually owns the copyright.
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread