* Is there a newer DLX port for gcc?
@ 2002-08-30 18:16 Alan Lehotsky
2002-09-02 11:51 ` Peter Bergner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Lehotsky @ 2002-08-30 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Anyone aware of an updated DLX port?
Stanford University's web site has a DLX port that's based on gcc
1.37. It doesn't seem to compile with GCC 3.1.1, and rather than try
and figure out the problems, I thought I'd ask if there was a modern
port anyway...
--
Carbon Design Systems, Inc.
apl@carbondesignsystems.com
781-890-1500 x204
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is there a newer DLX port for gcc?
2002-08-30 18:16 Is there a newer DLX port for gcc? Alan Lehotsky
@ 2002-09-02 11:51 ` Peter Bergner
2002-09-02 12:28 ` Alan Lehotsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Bergner @ 2002-09-02 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Lehotsky; +Cc: gcc
Alan Lehotsky wrote:
: Anyone aware of an updated DLX port?
:
: Stanford University's web site has a DLX port that's based on gcc
: 1.37. It doesn't seem to compile with GCC 3.1.1, and rather than try
: and figure out the problems, I thought I'd ask if there was a modern
: port anyway...
I wouldn't call it modern, but it's newer than gcc 1.3.7.
On the following URL, you'll find a DLX machine description file
for gcc 2.7.X:
http://www-mount.ee.umn.edu/operator/okeefe/mcerg/gcc-dlx.html
You'll also find glibc 1.09 targeted for DLX as well.
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is there a newer DLX port for gcc?
2002-09-02 11:51 ` Peter Bergner
@ 2002-09-02 12:28 ` Alan Lehotsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Lehotsky @ 2002-09-02 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Bergner; +Cc: gcc
Thanks!
Regards,
Al
At 1:51 PM -0500 9/2/02, Peter Bergner wrote:
>Alan Lehotsky wrote:
>: Anyone aware of an updated DLX port?
>:
>: Stanford University's web site has a DLX port that's based on gcc
>: 1.37. It doesn't seem to compile with GCC 3.1.1, and rather than try
>: and figure out the problems, I thought I'd ask if there was a modern
>: port anyway...
>
>I wouldn't call it modern, but it's newer than gcc 1.3.7.
>On the following URL, you'll find a DLX machine description file
>for gcc 2.7.X:
>
> http://www-mount.ee.umn.edu/operator/okeefe/mcerg/gcc-dlx.html
>
>You'll also find glibc 1.09 targeted for DLX as well.
>
>
>Peter
--
Carbon Design Systems, Inc.
apl@carbondesignsystems.com
781-890-1500 x204
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-02 19:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-30 18:16 Is there a newer DLX port for gcc? Alan Lehotsky
2002-09-02 11:51 ` Peter Bergner
2002-09-02 12:28 ` Alan Lehotsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).