1.0 release stopped compiling in libg++

1.0 release stopped compiling in libg++

[Pinwu Xu]

Hi there,
   Sorry I could not give more details now as I am away from the 
box. 
   I tried to compile on Slackware system, gcc2.7.2.3, libc5.4.39, 
libpthread 0.6, binutils 2.8.0.15 (the publically newest one), 
ld.so1.9.5. Grabbed libg++2.8.0.b6.3 from HJu's private ftp dir. 
Default (from configure) target is i486-pc-linux-glibc1 (gcc2.7.2.3 
is from Slackware ftp site). Applied the patch contained in the
README.libg++, put libg++ in egcs directory. 
   However compiling stopped when reaching libg++, the error said
as "target-libgxx-...not found". 
   BTW, what's the disk requirement? I got about 160M after install-
ing the source, will this be enough to run "make bootstrap" or I 
have to use "make bootstrap_lean"? I used the latter, as I failed
the first time, I found and applied the README.libg++ patch, reissued
the "make lean" command and it started from scratch. That's too bad.
Can this be changed to resume from the previous failed point?
   Thanks in advance for your help.

Pinwu

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Re: 1.0 release stopped compiling in libg++

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 19971204153800.27686.qmail@hotmail.com >you write:
  >    I tried to compile on Slackware system, gcc2.7.2.3, libc5.4.39, 
  > libpthread 0.6, binutils 2.8.0.15 (the publically newest one), 
  > ld.so1.9.5. Grabbed libg++2.8.0.b6.3 from HJu's private ftp dir. 
HU would have to comment on this.  Could be with with_gxx_include_dir
problem.

  >    BTW, what's the disk requirement? I got about 160M after install-
  > ing the source, will this be enough to run "make bootstrap"
I actually don't know.

It looks like my x86-linux is 100M with a "make bootstrap" of the entire
distribution.

So 160M should be OK.

There's some targets for continueing a build; wander through the toplevel
Makefile.in looking for bootstrap, bootstrap2, bootstrap3 and similar
targets.

jeff

Re: 1.0 release stopped compiling in libg++

[H.J. Lu]

> 
> Hi there,
>    Sorry I could not give more details now as I am away from the 
> box. 

I haven't tried release 1.0 yet. I am waiting for the diff.

>    I tried to compile on Slackware system, gcc2.7.2.3, libc5.4.39, 
> libpthread 0.6, binutils 2.8.0.15 (the publically newest one), 
> ld.so1.9.5. Grabbed libg++2.8.0.b6.3 from HJu's private ftp dir. 
> Default (from configure) target is i486-pc-linux-glibc1 (gcc2.7.2.3 
> is from Slackware ftp site). Applied the patch contained in the
> README.libg++, put libg++ in egcs directory. 
>    However compiling stopped when reaching libg++, the error said
> as "target-libgxx-...not found". 

What is the exact error message?

H.J.

Re: 1.0 release stopped compiling in libg++

[Pinwu Xu]

>  In message < 19971204153800.27686.qmail@hotmail.com >you write:
>  >    I tried to compile on Slackware system, gcc2.7.2.3, libc5.4.39, 
>  > libpthread 0.6, binutils 2.8.0.15 (the publically newest one), 
>  > ld.so1.9.5. Grabbed libg++2.8.0.b6.3 from HJu's private ftp dir. 
>HU would have to comment on this.  Could be with with_gxx_include_dir
>problem.

   Sorry for my previous post. After I applied HJLu's patch 
stated in README.libg++, reran configure, the compilation
finished! I'll list the testing result later.

>  >    BTW, what's the disk requirement? I got about 160M after 
install-
>  > ing the source, will this be enough to run "make bootstrap"
>I actually don't know.
>
>It looks like my x86-linux is 100M with a "make bootstrap" of the 
entire
>distribution.
>
>So 160M should be OK.

Well, 160M is barely enough. 

>
>There's some targets for continueing a build; wander through the 
toplevel
>Makefile.in looking for bootstrap, bootstrap2, bootstrap3 and similar
>targets.

"make -k check" gives:

        === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes        2943
# of unexpected failures    457
# of unexpected successes   1
# of expected failures      82
# of untested testcases     6
/home/pxu/tmp/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../xgcc version egcs-2.90.21 971202 
(egcs-1.00 release)      

        === g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes        130
# of unexpected failures    2
/home/pxu/tmp/objdir/gcc/g77 version egcs-2.90.21 971202 (egcs-1.00 
release)
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-finline-functions -funroll-all-loops

        === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes        4883
# of expected failures      5
# of unsupported tests      7
/home/pxu/tmp/objdir/gcc/xgcc version egcs-2.90.21 971202 (egcs-1.00 
release)  
XFAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c
XFAIL: gcc.failure/940409-1.c,  -O0
XFAIL: gcc.failure/940409-1.c,  -O1
XFAIL: gcc.failure/940409-1.c,  -O2
XFAIL: gcc.failure/940409-1.c,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-finline-functions

        === libio Summary ===

# of expected passes        40  
 
        === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes        30   

The "make -k check" ended with some error (I don't have the error
message now :-( ). But at least the whole egcs compiles!

Thanks for all who replied.

Pinwu 




______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com