public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [binutils-gdb] Ignore 0,0 entries in .debug_aranges
@ 2022-04-14 18:27 Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2022-04-14 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-cvs

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1a7c41d5ece7d0d1aa77d8019ee46f03181854fa

commit 1a7c41d5ece7d0d1aa77d8019ee46f03181854fa
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date:   Thu Apr 14 09:36:09 2022 -0600

    Ignore 0,0 entries in .debug_aranges
    
    When running the internal AdaCore test suite against the new DWARF
    indexer, I found one regression on RISC-V.  The test in question uses
    --gc-sections, and winds up with an entry in the middle of a
    .debug_aranges that has both address and length of 0.  In this
    scenario, gdb assumes the entries are terminated and then proceeds to
    reject the section because it reads a subsequent entry as if it were a
    header.
    
    It seems to me that, because each header describes the size of each
    .debug_aranges CU, it's better to simply ignore 0,0 entries and simply
    read to the end.  That is what this patch does.
    
    I've patched an existing test to provide a regression test for this.

Diff:
---
 gdb/dwarf2/read.c                                         | 11 +++++++++--
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/locexpr-data-member-location.exp |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/read.c b/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
index 698720276a9..6dcd446e5f4 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
@@ -2469,7 +2469,7 @@ read_addrmap_from_aranges (dwarf2_per_objfile *per_objfile,
 	 bytes.  */
       addr += (entry_end - addr) % (2 * address_size);
 
-      for (;;)
+      while (addr < entry_end)
 	{
 	  if (addr + 2 * address_size > entry_end)
 	    {
@@ -2487,7 +2487,14 @@ read_addrmap_from_aranges (dwarf2_per_objfile *per_objfile,
 						      dwarf5_byte_order);
 	  addr += address_size;
 	  if (start == 0 && length == 0)
-	    break;
+	    {
+	      /* This can happen on some targets with --gc-sections.
+		 This pair of values is also used to mark the end of
+		 the entries for a given CU, but we ignore it and
+		 instead handle termination using the check at the top
+		 of the loop.  */
+	      continue;
+	    }
 	  if (start == 0 && !per_bfd->has_section_at_zero)
 	    {
 	      /* Symbol was eliminated due to a COMDAT group.  */
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/locexpr-data-member-location.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/locexpr-data-member-location.exp
index 67e96fb1128..adb4e0a4c21 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/locexpr-data-member-location.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/locexpr-data-member-location.exp
@@ -296,6 +296,9 @@ Dwarf::assemble ${asm_file} {
     }
 
     aranges {} cu_label {
+	# This 0,0 entry tests that the .debug_aranges reader can
+	# handle an apparent terminator before the end of the ranges.
+	arange {} 0 0
 	arange {} $foo_start $foo_end
 	arange {} $bar_start $bar_end
     }


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-04-14 18:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-14 18:27 [binutils-gdb] Ignore 0,0 entries in .debug_aranges Tom Tromey

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).