public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [binutils-gdb] gdb: fix for gdb.base/eof-exit.exp test failures
@ 2022-05-09 14:01 Andrew Burgess
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Burgess @ 2022-05-09 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-cvs
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=205d0542821c91e04e0ed174d8862f486a076950
commit 205d0542821c91e04e0ed174d8862f486a076950
Author: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Apr 20 14:08:49 2022 +0100
gdb: fix for gdb.base/eof-exit.exp test failures
This fix relates to PR gdb/29032, this makes the test more stable by
ensuring that the Ctrl-D is only sent once the prompt has been
displayed. This issue was also discussed on the mailing list here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-April/187670.html
The problem identified in the bug report is that sometimes the Ctrl-D
(that the test sends to GDB) arrives while GDB is processing a
command. When this happens the Ctrl-D is handled differently than if
the Ctrl-D is sent while GDB is waiting for input at a prompt.
The original intent of the test was that the Ctrl-D be sent while GDB
was waiting at a prompt, and that is the case the occurs most often,
but, when the Ctrl-D arrives during command processing, then GDB will
ignore the Ctrl-D, and the test will fail.
This commit ensures the Ctrl-D is always sent while GDB is waiting at
a prompt, which makes this test stable.
But, that still leaves an open question, what should happen when the
Ctrl-D arrives while GDB is processing a command? This commit doesn't
attempt to answer that question, which is while bug PR gdb/29032 will
not be closed once this commit is merged.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29032
Diff:
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/eof-exit.exp | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/eof-exit.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/eof-exit.exp
index ad5f33d2f10..e04c38bf8d7 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/eof-exit.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/eof-exit.exp
@@ -25,9 +25,27 @@ proc run_test {} {
#
# Send a newline character, which will cause GDB to redisplay the
# prompt.
+ #
+ # We then consume the newline characters, and then make use of
+ # expect's -notransfer option to ensure that the prompt has been
+ # displayed, but to leave the prompt in expect's internal buffer.
+ # This is important as the following test wants to check how GDB
+ # displays the 'quit' message relative to the prompt, this is much
+ # easier to do if the prompt is still in expect's buffers.
+ #
+ # The other special thing we do here is avoid printing a 'PASS'
+ # result. The reason for this is so that the GDB output in the
+ # log file will match what a user should see, this makes it much
+ # easier to debug issues. Obviously we could print a 'PASS' here
+ # as the text printed by expect is not considered part of GDB's
+ # output, so the pattern matching will work just fine... but, the
+ # log file becomes much harder to read.
send_gdb "\n"
gdb_test_multiple "" "discard newline" {
-re "^\r\n" {
+ exp_continue
+ }
+ -notransfer -re "^\[^\n\]*$::gdb_prompt $" {
}
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-05-09 14:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-09 14:01 [binutils-gdb] gdb: fix for gdb.base/eof-exit.exp test failures Andrew Burgess
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).