public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [binutils-gdb] Clarify why we unit test matching symbol names with 0xff characters
@ 2022-05-31 12:57 Pedro Alves
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2022-05-31 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-cvs
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=102a644eaaa8b258f021da71028c32e0744d73ce
commit 102a644eaaa8b258f021da71028c32e0744d73ce
Author: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Date: Tue May 31 13:36:32 2022 +0100
Clarify why we unit test matching symbol names with 0xff characters
In the name matching unit tests in gdb/dwarf2/read.c, explain better
why we test symbols with \377 / 0xff characters (Latin1 'ÿ').
Change-Id: I517f13adfff2e4d3cd783fec1d744e2b26e18b8e
Diff:
---
gdb/dwarf2/read.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/read.c b/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
index c4578c687d2..848fd5627b8 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/read.c
@@ -3628,10 +3628,17 @@ static const char *test_symbols[] = {
is "function" in PT). */
u8"u8função",
- /* \377 (0xff) is Latin1 'ÿ'. */
+ /* Test a symbol name that ends with a 0xff character, which is a
+ valid character in non-UTF-8 source character sets (e.g. Latin1
+ 'ÿ'), and we can't rule out compilers allowing it in identifiers.
+ We test this because the completion algorithm finds the upper
+ bound of symbols by looking for the insertion point of
+ "func"-with-last-character-incremented, i.e. "fund", and adding 1
+ to 0xff should wraparound and carry to the previous character.
+ See comments in make_sort_after_prefix_name. */
"yfunc\377",
- /* \377 (0xff) is Latin1 'ÿ'. */
+ /* Some more symbols with \377 (0xff). See above. */
"\377",
"\377\377123",
@@ -3701,7 +3708,8 @@ test_mapped_index_find_name_component_bounds ()
}
/* Check that the increment-last-char in the name matching algorithm
- for completion doesn't get confused with Ansi1 'ÿ' / 0xff. */
+ for completion doesn't get confused with Ansi1 'ÿ' / 0xff. See
+ make_sort_after_prefix_name. */
{
static const char *expected_syms1[] = {
"\377",
@@ -3770,7 +3778,8 @@ test_dw2_expand_symtabs_matching_symbol ()
}
/* Check that the name matching algorithm for completion doesn't get
- confused with Latin1 'ÿ' / 0xff. */
+ confused with Latin1 'ÿ' / 0xff. See
+ make_sort_after_prefix_name. */
{
static const char str[] = "\377";
CHECK_MATCH (str, symbol_name_match_type::FULL, true,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-05-31 12:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-31 12:57 [binutils-gdb] Clarify why we unit test matching symbol names with 0xff characters Pedro Alves
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).