public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [binutils-gdb] [gdb/testsuite] Fix regression in step-indirect-call-thunk.exp with gcc 7
@ 2022-07-18 4:13 Tom de Vries
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tom de Vries @ 2022-07-18 4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-cvs
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9d9dd861e9815829124a4413f0446e3bcc119dca
commit 9d9dd861e9815829124a4413f0446e3bcc119dca
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date: Mon Jul 18 06:13:45 2022 +0200
[gdb/testsuite] Fix regression in step-indirect-call-thunk.exp with gcc 7
Since commit 43127ae5714 ("Fix gdb.base/step-indirect-call-thunk.exp") I run
into:
...
gdb compile failed, gcc: error: unrecognized command line option \
'-fcf-protection=none'; did you mean '-flto-partition=none'?
UNTESTED: gdb.base/step-indirect-call-thunk.exp: failed to prepare
...
The problem is that -fcf-protection is supported starting gcc 8, but I'm using
system gcc 7.5.0.
Fix this by only adding -fcf-protection=none for gcc 8 and later.
Tested on x86_64-linux, with gcc 7.5.0, 8.2.1 and 12.1.1.
Diff:
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-indirect-call-thunk.exp | 6 +++++-
gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-indirect-call-thunk.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-indirect-call-thunk.exp
index 7c1b53c99be..c4f69adc9b2 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-indirect-call-thunk.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-indirect-call-thunk.exp
@@ -19,7 +19,11 @@ if { ![istarget "x86*"] } {
return
}
-set cflags "-mindirect-branch=thunk -mfunction-return=thunk -fcf-protection=none"
+set cflags "-mindirect-branch=thunk -mfunction-return=thunk"
+
+if { [gcc_major_version] >= 8 } {
+ append cflags " -fcf-protection=none"
+}
if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile \
[list debug "additional_flags=$cflags"]] } {
return -1
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
index 698dd14504e..5d6f1266b0f 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
@@ -8529,6 +8529,17 @@ gdb_caching_proc supports_gnuc {
return [gdb_simple_compile $me $src object ""]
}
+# Return 1 if compiler supports __GNUC__, otherwise return 0.
+gdb_caching_proc supports_gnuc {
+ set me "supports_gnuc"
+ set src {
+ #ifndef __GNUC__
+ #error "No gnuc"
+ #endif
+ }
+ return [gdb_simple_compile $me $src object ""]
+}
+
# Return 1 if target supports mpx, otherwise return 0.
gdb_caching_proc have_mpx {
global srcdir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-07-18 4:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-18 4:13 [binutils-gdb] [gdb/testsuite] Fix regression in step-indirect-call-thunk.exp with gcc 7 Tom de Vries
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).