public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [binutils-gdb] gdb/testsuite: use a more unique name in gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp
@ 2022-11-07 15:48 Simon Marchi
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2022-11-07 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-cvs
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=240e07bd94a8da9270c57cde394f6883e43b8497
commit 240e07bd94a8da9270c57cde394f6883e43b8497
Author: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Date: Mon Nov 7 09:38:12 2022 -0500
gdb/testsuite: use a more unique name in gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp
I see failures in this test, due to the function name "add" being too
generic, and unexpected breakpoint locations being found in my
libstdc++, such as (wrapped for readability):
{
number="2.4",enabled="y",addr="0x00007ffff7d67e68",
func="(anonymous namespace)::fast_float::bigint::add",
file="/usr/src/debug/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fast_float/fast_float.h",
fullname="/usr/src/debug/gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fast_float/fast_float.h",
line="1815", thread-groups=["i1"]
}
Change the test to use a more unique name.
Change-Id: I91de781be62d246eb41c73eaa410ebdd12633d1d
Diff:
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.cc | 8 ++++----
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.cc
index ab820ffdb64..969e3cbe723 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.cc
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.cc
@@ -16,13 +16,13 @@
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
static int
-add (int a, int b)
+a_very_unique_name (int a, int b)
{
return a + b;
}
static double
-add (double a, double b)
+a_very_unique_name (double a, double b)
{
return a + b;
}
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ add (double a, double b)
int
main (void)
{
- int i = add (3, 4);
- double d = add (3.0, 4.0);
+ int i = a_very_unique_name (3, 4);
+ double d = a_very_unique_name (3.0, 4.0);
return 1;
}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp
index 8600b1bebc0..51647471f52 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp
@@ -67,12 +67,12 @@ proc do_test { mi_version use_fix_flag expect_fixed_output } {
# Check the breakpoint-created event.
set pattern [make_breakpoints_pattern $expect_fixed_output 2 y y]
- mi_gdb_test "break add" \
- [multi_line "&\"break add\\\\n\"" \
+ mi_gdb_test "break a_very_unique_name" \
+ [multi_line "&\"break a_very_unique_name\\\\n\"" \
"~\"Breakpoint ${decimal} at.*\\(2 locations\\)\\\\n\"" \
"=breakpoint-created,${pattern}" \
"\\^done" ] \
- "break add"
+ "break a_very_unique_name"
# Check the -break-info output.
mi_gdb_test "-break-info" \
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ proc do_test { mi_version use_fix_flag expect_fixed_output } {
# Check the -break-insert response.
set pattern [make_breakpoints_pattern $expect_fixed_output 3 y y]
- mi_gdb_test "-break-insert add" "\\^done,${pattern}" "insert breakpoint with MI command"
+ mi_gdb_test "-break-insert a_very_unique_name" "\\^done,${pattern}" "insert breakpoint with MI command"
# Modify enableness through MI commands shouldn't trigger MI
# notification.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-11-07 15:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-07 15:48 [binutils-gdb] gdb/testsuite: use a more unique name in gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-multiple-locations.exp Simon Marchi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).