[binutils-gdb] gdb/doc: The RISC-V vector registers didn't change

[binutils-gdb] gdb/doc: The RISC-V vector registers didn't change

[Palmer Dabbelt]

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ee65c8f578bd531b1bf393cd79787dada3d1eb39

commit ee65c8f578bd531b1bf393cd79787dada3d1eb39
Author: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Date:   Thu Jan 26 15:09:29 2023 -0800

    gdb/doc: The RISC-V vector registers didn't change
    
    When we merged the GDB vector register support we did it a bit early,
    just eating the risk in the very unlikely case that the vector register
    names changed.  They didn't, so we can now remove the caveat in the docs
    that they might.

Diff:
---
 gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index 2a2077c29d1..c1ca45521ea 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -48227,11 +48227,7 @@ other floating point hardware.
 
 The @samp{org.gnu.gdb.riscv.vector} feature is optional.  If present,
 it should contain registers @samp{v0} through @samp{v31}, all of which
-must be the same size.  These requirements are based on the v0.10
-draft vector extension, as the vector extension is not yet final.  In
-the event that the register set of the vector extension changes for
-the final specification, the requirements given here could change for
-future releases of @value{GDBN}.
+must be the same size.
 
 @node RX Features
 @subsection RX Features