[binutils-gdb] gdb: remove an out of date comment about disp_del_at_next_stop

[binutils-gdb] gdb: remove an out of date comment about disp_del_at_next_stop

[Andrew Burgess]

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=02aadca4fbeadbab6584222ca78dbc24c79f5229

commit 02aadca4fbeadbab6584222ca78dbc24c79f5229
Author: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 16 19:07:12 2023 +0000

    gdb: remove an out of date comment about disp_del_at_next_stop
    
    Delete an out of date comment about disp_del_at_next_stop, the comment
    says:
    
      /* NOTE drow/2003-09-08: This state only exists for removing
         watchpoints.  It's not clear that it's necessary...  */
    
    I'm sure this was true when the comment was added, but today the
    disp_del_at_next_stop state is not just used for deleting watchpoints,
    which leaves us with "It's not clear that it's necessary...", which
    doesn't really help at all.
    
    And then this comment is located on one random place where
    disp_del_at_next_stop is used, rather than at its definition site.
    
    Lets just delete the comment.
    
    No user visible changes after this commit.
    
    Reviewed-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>

Diff:
---
 gdb/breakpoint.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
index ebf9d8f1349..7d11f7199fe 100644
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -2938,8 +2938,6 @@ insert_bp_location (struct bp_location *bl,
     }
 
   else if (bl->loc_type == bp_loc_hardware_watchpoint
-	   /* NOTE drow/2003-09-08: This state only exists for removing
-	      watchpoints.  It's not clear that it's necessary...  */
 	   && bl->owner->disposition != disp_del_at_next_stop)
     {
       int val;