public inbox for gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [binutils-gdb] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/m-static.exp regression on Ubuntu 20.04
@ 2023-03-24  8:18 Tom de Vries
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tom de Vries @ 2023-03-24  8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-cvs

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1985d8cb7048bcfce60b59cfe219d3b09bda6373

commit 1985d8cb7048bcfce60b59cfe219d3b09bda6373
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date:   Fri Mar 24 09:18:07 2023 +0100

    [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/m-static.exp regression on Ubuntu 20.04
    
    In commit 722c4596034 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/*.exp for remote host"), I
    needed to change ".*/" into "(.*/)?" in:
    ...
    gdb_test "info variable everywhere" \
        "File .*/m-static\[.\]h.*const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;"
    ...
    
    However, due to the fact that I got this output:
    ...
    (gdb) info variable everywhere^M
    All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M
    ^M
    File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:^M
    8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
    ^M
    File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static1.cc:^M
    8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
    ...
    I decided to make the matching somewhat stricter, to make sure that the two
    matched lines were subsequent.
    
    The commit turned out to be more strict than intended, and caused a regression
    on Ubuntu 20.04, where the output was instead:
    ...
    (gdb) info variable everywhere^M
    All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M
    ^M
    File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:^M
    8:      const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M
    ...
    
    At that point I realized I'm looking at a bug (filed as PR symtab/30265),
    which manifests on openSUSE Leap 15.4 for native and readnow, and on Ubuntu
    20.04 for readnow, but not for native.
    
    Before my commit, the test-case passed whether the bug manifested or not.
    
    After my commit, the test-case only passed when the bug manifested.
    
    Fix the test-case regression by reverting to the situation before the commit:
    pass whether the bug manifests or not.  We could add an xfail for the PR, but
    I'm expecting a fix soon, so that doesn't look worth the effort.
    
    Tested on x86_64-linux, both on openSUSE Leap 15.4 and Ubuntu 20.04, both with
    native and readnow.
    
    Reported-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>

Diff:
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp
index 419d772e28e..37d3289a751 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp
@@ -186,8 +186,7 @@ if { $non_dwarf } { setup_xfail *-*-* }
 gdb_test "info variable everywhere" \
     [multi_line \
 	 "File (.*/)?m-static\[.\]h:" \
-	 "$decimal:\tconst int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;" \
-	 ".*"]
+	 "$decimal:\tconst int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;.*"]
 
 # Perhaps at some point test4 should also include a test for a static
 # const int that was initialized in the header file.  But I'm not sure

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-03-24  8:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-24  8:18 [binutils-gdb] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/m-static.exp regression on Ubuntu 20.04 Tom de Vries

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).