From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux: Avoid pread64/pwrite64 for high memory addresses (PR gdb/30525)
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 18:00:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17a52bbc-1bed-0850-1096-4a502fc52b86@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c798e514-0670-9630-3516-5e304521eece@palves.net>
On 2023-07-06 17:47, Pedro Alves wrote:
> From what I can tell in those two threads, this was really only about the comments case. I'll
> drop the braces from my patch and merge it.
Done, like so. Just realized I forgot to add Andrew's tag. Sorry about that...
From 31a56a22c45d76df4c597439f337e3f75ac3065c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 10:38:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Linux: Avoid pread64/pwrite64 for high memory addresses (PR
gdb/30525)
Since commit 05c06f318fd9 ("Linux: Access memory even if threads are
running"), GDB prefers pread64/pwrite64 to access inferior memory
instead of ptrace. That change broke reading shared libraries on
SPARC64 Linux, as reported by PR gdb/30525 ("gdb cannot read shared
libraries on SPARC64").
On SPARC64 Linux, surprisingly (to me), userspace shared libraries are
mapped at high 64-bit addresses:
(gdb) info sharedlibrary
Cannot access memory at address 0xfff80001002011e0
Cannot access memory at address 0xfff80001002011d8
Cannot access memory at address 0xfff80001002011d8
From To Syms Read Shared Object Library
0xfff80001000010a0 0xfff8000100021f80 Yes (*) /lib64/ld-linux.so.2
(*): Shared library is missing debugging information.
Those addresses are 64-bit addresses with the high bits set. When
interpreted as signed, they're negative.
The Linux kernel rejects pread64/pwrite64 if the offset argument of
type off_t (a signed type) is negative, which happens if the memory
address we're accessing has its high bit set. See
linux/fs/read_write.c sys_pread64 and sys_pwrite64 in Linux.
Thankfully, lseek does not fail in that situation. So the fix is to
use the 'lseek + read|write' path if the offset would be negative.
Fix this in both native GDB and GDBserver.
Tested on a SPARC64 GNU/Linux and x86-64 GNU/Linux.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30525
Change-Id: I79c724f918037ea67b7396fadb521bc9d1b10dc5
---
gdb/linux-nat.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
gdbserver/linux-low.cc | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/linux-nat.c b/gdb/linux-nat.c
index 383ef58fa23..4f7b6f8194f 100644
--- a/gdb/linux-nat.c
+++ b/gdb/linux-nat.c
@@ -3909,18 +3909,26 @@ linux_proc_xfer_memory_partial_fd (int fd, int pid,
gdb_assert (fd != -1);
- /* Use pread64/pwrite64 if available, since they save a syscall and can
- handle 64-bit offsets even on 32-bit platforms (for instance, SPARC
- debugging a SPARC64 application). */
+ /* Use pread64/pwrite64 if available, since they save a syscall and
+ can handle 64-bit offsets even on 32-bit platforms (for instance,
+ SPARC debugging a SPARC64 application). But only use them if the
+ offset isn't so high that when cast to off_t it'd be negative, as
+ seen on SPARC64. pread64/pwrite64 outright reject such offsets.
+ lseek does not. */
#ifdef HAVE_PREAD64
- ret = (readbuf ? pread64 (fd, readbuf, len, offset)
- : pwrite64 (fd, writebuf, len, offset));
-#else
- ret = lseek (fd, offset, SEEK_SET);
- if (ret != -1)
- ret = (readbuf ? read (fd, readbuf, len)
- : write (fd, writebuf, len));
+ if ((off_t) offset >= 0)
+ ret = (readbuf != nullptr
+ ? pread64 (fd, readbuf, len, offset)
+ : pwrite64 (fd, writebuf, len, offset));
+ else
#endif
+ {
+ ret = lseek (fd, offset, SEEK_SET);
+ if (ret != -1)
+ ret = (readbuf != nullptr
+ ? read (fd, readbuf, len)
+ : write (fd, writebuf, len));
+ }
if (ret == -1)
{
diff --git a/gdbserver/linux-low.cc b/gdbserver/linux-low.cc
index 8ab16698632..651f219b738 100644
--- a/gdbserver/linux-low.cc
+++ b/gdbserver/linux-low.cc
@@ -5377,21 +5377,26 @@ proc_xfer_memory (CORE_ADDR memaddr, unsigned char *readbuf,
{
int bytes;
- /* If pread64 is available, use it. It's faster if the kernel
- supports it (only one syscall), and it's 64-bit safe even on
- 32-bit platforms (for instance, SPARC debugging a SPARC64
- application). */
+ /* Use pread64/pwrite64 if available, since they save a syscall
+ and can handle 64-bit offsets even on 32-bit platforms (for
+ instance, SPARC debugging a SPARC64 application). But only
+ use them if the offset isn't so high that when cast to off_t
+ it'd be negative, as seen on SPARC64. pread64/pwrite64
+ outright reject such offsets. lseek does not. */
#ifdef HAVE_PREAD64
- bytes = (readbuf != nullptr
- ? pread64 (fd, readbuf, len, memaddr)
- : pwrite64 (fd, writebuf, len, memaddr));
-#else
- bytes = -1;
- if (lseek (fd, memaddr, SEEK_SET) != -1)
+ if ((off_t) memaddr >= 0)
bytes = (readbuf != nullptr
- ? read (fd, readbuf, len)
- : write (fd, writebuf, len));
+ ? pread64 (fd, readbuf, len, memaddr)
+ : pwrite64 (fd, writebuf, len, memaddr));
+ else
#endif
+ {
+ bytes = -1;
+ if (lseek (fd, memaddr, SEEK_SET) != -1)
+ bytes = (readbuf != nullptr
+ ? read (fd, readbuf, len)
+ : write (fd, writebuf, len));
+ }
if (bytes < 0)
return errno;
base-commit: c0c3bb70f2f13e07295041cdf24a4d2997fe99a4
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-06 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-05 13:41 Pedro Alves
2023-07-05 14:45 ` Matt Turner
2023-07-05 17:59 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-07-06 13:43 ` Pedro Alves
2023-07-06 13:54 ` Pedro Alves
2023-07-06 15:25 ` Tom Tromey
2023-07-06 16:47 ` Pedro Alves
2023-07-06 17:00 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2023-07-07 15:18 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17a52bbc-1bed-0850-1096-4a502fc52b86@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).