public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zoran Zaric <zoran.zaric@amd.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 23/28] Add support for any location description in CFI
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:38:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211105113849.118800-24-zoran.zaric@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211105113849.118800-1-zoran.zaric@amd.com>

From: Zoran Zaric <Zoran.Zaric@amd.com>

One of the main benefits of allowing location description to be on the
DWARF stack is that now CFI expression based register rules can be
defined using a location description operations. This allows a register
of one frame to be saved in any location, including any composite
location.

To fully support this feature, the execute_stack_op function in
dwarf2/frame.c needs to return a single struct value object instead of
just an address.

Function put_frame_register_bytes also needs to change to support any
location description.

This support is a one of the key features to truly support optimized
code.

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* dwarf2/frame.c (execute_stack_op): Change to return a struct
	value object.
	(dwarf2_frame_cache): Change to call new execute_stack_op
	definition.
	(dwarf2_frame_prev_register): Change to call new execute_stack_op
	definition.
	* frame.c (put_frame_register_bytes): Add support for writing to
	composite location description.
---
 gdb/dwarf2/frame.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 gdb/frame.c        | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
index e17b36e243b..e70dcd5a86e 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
@@ -236,16 +236,17 @@ register %s (#%d) at %s"),
     }
 }
 
-static CORE_ADDR
+static value *
 execute_stack_op (const gdb_byte *exp, ULONGEST len, int addr_size,
 		  struct frame_info *this_frame, CORE_ADDR initial,
-		  int initial_in_stack_memory, dwarf2_per_objfile *per_objfile)
+		  int initial_in_stack_memory, dwarf2_per_objfile *per_objfile,
+		  struct type* type = nullptr, bool as_lval = true)
 {
   scoped_value_mark free_values;
-  struct type *type = address_type (per_objfile->objfile->arch (),
-				    addr_size);
+  struct type *init_type = address_type (per_objfile->objfile->arch (),
+					 addr_size);
 
-  value *init_value = value_at_lazy (type, initial);
+  value *init_value = value_at_lazy (init_type, initial);
   std::vector<value *> init_values;
 
   set_value_stack (init_value, initial_in_stack_memory);
@@ -255,10 +256,15 @@ execute_stack_op (const gdb_byte *exp, ULONGEST len, int addr_size,
     = dwarf2_evaluate (exp, len, true, per_objfile, nullptr,
 		       this_frame, addr_size, &init_values, nullptr);
 
-  if (VALUE_LVAL (result_val) == lval_memory)
-    return value_address (result_val);
-  else
-    return value_as_address (result_val);
+  /* We need to clean up all the values that are not needed any more.
+     The problem with a value_ref_ptr class is that it disconnects the
+     RETVAL from the value garbage collection, so we need to make
+     a copy of that value on the stack to keep everything consistent.
+     The value_ref_ptr will clean up after itself at the end of this block.  */
+  value_ref_ptr value_holder = value_ref_ptr::new_reference (result_val);
+  free_values.free_to_mark ();
+
+  return value_copy (result_val);
 }
 \f
 
@@ -989,10 +995,14 @@ dwarf2_frame_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache)
 	  break;
 
 	case CFA_EXP:
-	  cache->cfa =
-	    execute_stack_op (fs.regs.cfa_exp, fs.regs.cfa_exp_len,
-			      cache->addr_size, this_frame, 0, 0,
-			      cache->per_objfile);
+	  {
+	    struct value *value
+	      = execute_stack_op (fs.regs.cfa_exp, fs.regs.cfa_exp_len,
+				  cache->addr_size, this_frame, 0, 0,
+				  cache->per_objfile);
+	    cache->cfa = value_address (value);
+	  }
+
 	  break;
 
 	default:
@@ -1190,24 +1200,22 @@ dwarf2_frame_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache,
       return frame_unwind_got_register (this_frame, regnum, realnum);
 
     case DWARF2_FRAME_REG_SAVED_EXP:
-      addr = execute_stack_op (cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.start,
+      return execute_stack_op (cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.start,
 			       cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.len,
-			       cache->addr_size,
-			       this_frame, cache->cfa, 1,
-			       cache->per_objfile);
-      return frame_unwind_got_memory (this_frame, regnum, addr);
+			       cache->addr_size, this_frame,
+			       cache->cfa, 1, cache->per_objfile,
+			       register_type (gdbarch, regnum));
 
     case DWARF2_FRAME_REG_SAVED_VAL_OFFSET:
       addr = cache->cfa + cache->reg[regnum].loc.offset;
       return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, regnum, addr);
 
     case DWARF2_FRAME_REG_SAVED_VAL_EXP:
-      addr = execute_stack_op (cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.start,
+      return execute_stack_op (cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.start,
 			       cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.len,
-			       cache->addr_size,
-			       this_frame, cache->cfa, 1,
-			       cache->per_objfile);
-      return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, regnum, addr);
+			       cache->addr_size, this_frame,
+			       cache->cfa, 1, cache->per_objfile,
+			       register_type (gdbarch, regnum), false);
 
     case DWARF2_FRAME_REG_UNSPECIFIED:
       /* GCC, in its infinite wisdom decided to not provide unwind
diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
index 2a899fc494f..3dd6c799847 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/frame.c
@@ -1534,19 +1534,42 @@ put_frame_register_bytes (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
     {
       int curr_len = register_size (gdbarch, regnum) - offset;
 
+      struct value *value = frame_unwind_register_value (frame->next,
+							 regnum);
+
       if (curr_len > len)
 	curr_len = len;
 
       const gdb_byte *myaddr = buffer.data ();
-      if (curr_len == register_size (gdbarch, regnum))
+
+      /*  Computed value is a special case.  The computed callback
+	  mechanism requires a strut value argument, so we need to
+	  make one.  */
+      if (value != nullptr && VALUE_LVAL (value) == lval_computed)
+	{
+	  const lval_funcs *funcs = value_computed_funcs (value);
+
+	  if (funcs->write == nullptr)
+	    error (_("Attempt to assign to an unmodifiable value."));
+
+	  type * reg_type = register_type (gdbarch, regnum);
+
+	  struct value *from_value = allocate_value (reg_type);
+	  memcpy (value_contents_raw (from_value), myaddr,
+		  TYPE_LENGTH (reg_type));
+
+	  set_value_offset (value, offset);
+
+	  funcs->write (value, from_value);
+	  release_value (from_value);
+	}
+      else if (curr_len == register_size (gdbarch, regnum))
 	{
 	  put_frame_register (frame, regnum, myaddr);
 	}
       else
 	{
-	  struct value *value = frame_unwind_register_value (frame->next,
-							     regnum);
-	  gdb_assert (value != NULL);
+	  gdb_assert (value != nullptr);
 
 	  memcpy ((char *) value_contents_writeable (value).data () + offset,
 		  myaddr, curr_len);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-05 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-05 11:38 [PATCH v4 00/28] Allow location description on the DWARF stack Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/28] Add new register access interface to expr.c Zoran Zaric
2021-12-14 20:34   ` Tom Tromey
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/28] Add new memory " Zoran Zaric
2021-12-14 20:42   ` Tom Tromey
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/28] Add new classes that model DWARF stack element Zoran Zaric
2021-12-14 21:10   ` Tom Tromey
2022-01-12 10:23     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/28] Add to_location method to dwarf_value class Zoran Zaric
2021-12-14 21:16   ` Tom Tromey
2022-01-12 10:51     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/28] Add to_value method to dwarf_location class Zoran Zaric
2021-12-14 21:34   ` Tom Tromey
2022-01-12 12:14     ` Zoran Zaric
2022-01-12 18:42       ` Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/28] Add read method to location description classes Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/28] Add write " Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/28] Add deref " Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 09/28] Add read_from_gdb_value method to dwarf_location Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 10/28] Add write_to_gdb_value " Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 11/28] Add is_implicit_ptr_at " Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 12/28] Add indirect_implicit_ptr to dwarf_location class Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 13/28] Add is_optimized_out " Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 14/28] Add new computed struct value callback interface Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 15/28] Add to_gdb_value method to DWARF entry class Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 16/28] Change DWARF stack to use new dwarf_entry classes Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 17/28] Remove old computed struct value callbacks Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 18/28] Comments cleanup between expr.h and expr.c Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 19/28] Remove dwarf_expr_context from expr.h interface Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 20/28] Move read_addr_from_reg function to frame.c Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 21/28] Add frame info check to DW_OP_reg operations Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 22/28] Remove DWARF expression composition check Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` Zoran Zaric [this message]
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 24/28] Add DWARF operations for byte and bit offset Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 25/28] Add support for DW_OP_LLVM_undefined operation Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 26/28] Add support for nested composite locations Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 27/28] Add DW_OP_LLVM_extend DWARF operation Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:38 ` [PATCH v4 28/28] Add DW_OP_LLVM_select_bit_piece " Zoran Zaric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211105113849.118800-24-zoran.zaric@amd.com \
    --to=zoran.zaric@amd.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).