public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] Change gdb.base/skip-solib.exp deal with lack of epilogue information
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:50:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220126195053.69559-4-blarsen@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220126195053.69559-1-blarsen@redhat.com>

When testing with clang, this feature worked, but the test failed
because it checked specifically to see if we were at the main function.
Without epilogue information, the inferior would be at libc_start_main
(or equivalent) instead. Having this test changed would allows us to
identify if the test stops working for real at some point.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip-solib.exp | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip-solib.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip-solib.exp
index ce2b080229e..99833533b6a 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip-solib.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/skip-solib.exp
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ with_test_prefix "ignoring solib file" {
     # We shouldn't step into square(), since we skipped skip-solib-lib.c.
     #
     gdb_test "step" ""
-    gdb_test "bt" "#0\\s+main.*"
+    gdb_test "bt 1" "#0.*main.*"
 }
 
 #
@@ -114,5 +114,12 @@ with_test_prefix "ignoring solib function" {
     # the last line of square.
     #
     gdb_test "step" ""
-    gdb_test "bt" "#0\\s+square.*"
+    gdb_test_multiple "bt 1" "skipped multiply" {
+	-re "#0\\s+square.*" {
+	    pass "skipped multiply"
+	}
+	-re "#0.*main.*" {
+	    pass "skipped multiply"
+	}
+    }
 }
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-26 19:50 [PATCH 00/11] gdb/testsuite: Cleanup gdb.base for clang testing Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 01/11] change gdb.base/skip.exp to use finish instead of step Bruno Larsen
2022-02-25 17:00   ` Andrew Burgess
2022-03-02 16:11   ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-02 16:39     ` Andrew Burgess
2022-03-07 19:59       ` Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 02/11] change gdb.base/symbol-alias to xfail with clang Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` Bruno Larsen [this message]
2022-03-02 16:17   ` [PATCH 03/11] Change gdb.base/skip-solib.exp deal with lack of epilogue information Pedro Alves
2022-03-07 19:53     ` Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 04/11] change gdb.base/nodebug.c to not fail with clang Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 05/11] update gdb.base/info-program.exp " Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 06/11] fix gdb.base/access-mem-running.exp for clang testing Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 07/11] fix gdb.base/call-ar-st to work with clang Bruno Larsen
2022-03-02 18:59   ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-04 14:14     ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-07 20:39     ` Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 08/11] add xfails to gdb.base/complex-parts.exp when testing " Bruno Larsen
2022-03-02 19:10   ` Pedro Alves
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 09/11] gdb/testsuite: don't test gdb.base/msym-bp-shl " Bruno Larsen
2022-03-02 19:33   ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-08 12:58     ` Bruno Larsen
2022-03-30 12:19     ` Bruno Larsen
2022-03-31 18:49       ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-31 19:13         ` Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] make use of finish to leave function in gdb.base/skip-inline.exp Bruno Larsen
2022-01-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] explicitly test for stderr in gdb.base/dprintf.exp Bruno Larsen
2022-03-02 16:50   ` Pedro Alves
2022-03-31 13:44     ` Bruno Larsen
2022-03-31 14:31       ` Pedro Alves
2022-02-09 12:03 ` [PING][PATCH 00/11] gdb/testsuite: Cleanup gdb.base for clang testing Bruno Larsen
2022-02-21 12:53   ` [PINGv2][PATCH " Bruno Larsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220126195053.69559-4-blarsen@redhat.com \
    --to=blarsen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).