public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Rohr <stephan.rohr@intel.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: stephan.rohr@intel.com, tom@tromey.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gdb/dwarf2: Fix 'rw_pieced_value' for values casted to different type.
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:44:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220422144420.3545190-2-stephan.rohr@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422144420.3545190-1-stephan.rohr@intel.com>

From: "Rohr, Stephan" <stephan.rohr@intel.com>

The 'rw_pieced_value' function is executed when fetching a (lazy)
variable described by 'DW_OP_piece' or 'DW_OP_bit_piece'.  The
function checks the 'type' and 'enclosing_type' fields of the value
for identity.

  * The 'type' field describes the type of a value.
  * In most cases, the 'enclosing_type' field is identical to the
    'type' field.
  * Scenarios where the 'type' and 'enclosing_type' of an object
    differ are described in 'gdb/value.c'.  Possible cases are:
    * If a value represents a C++ object, then the 'type' field
      gives the object's compile-time type.  If the object actually
      belongs to some class derived from `type', perhaps with other
      base classes and additional members, then `type' is just a
      subobject of the real thing, and the full object is probably
      larger than `type' would suggest.
    * If 'type' is a dynamic class (i.e. one with a vtable), then GDB
      can actually determine the object's run-time type by looking at
      the run-time type information in the vtable.  GDB may then elect
      to read the entire object.
    * If the user casts a variable to a different type
      (e.g. 'print (<type> []) <variable>'), the value's type is
      updated before reading the value.

If a lazy value is fetched, GDB allocates space based on the
enclosing type's length and typically reads the 'full' object.
This is not implemented for pieced values and causes an internal
error if 'type' and 'enclosing_type' of a value are not identical.

However, GDB can read the value based on its type.  Thus, it should be
sufficient to check if the type's length (potentially shifted by
'embedded_offset') does not exceed the enclosing type's length which was
used for memory allocation.
---
 gdb/dwarf2/expr.c                       |  6 ++----
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/shortpiece.exp | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c b/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c
index 99862583336..6330a5787fc 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/expr.c
@@ -174,10 +174,8 @@ rw_pieced_value (value *v, value *from, bool check_optimized)
     }
   else
     {
-      if (value_type (v) != value_enclosing_type (v))
-	internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
-			_("Should not be able to create a lazy value with "
-			  "an enclosing type"));
+      gdb_assert ((TYPE_LENGTH (value_type (v)) + value_embedded_offset (v))
+		  <= TYPE_LENGTH (value_enclosing_type (v)));
       if (check_optimized)
 	v_contents = nullptr;
       else
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/shortpiece.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/shortpiece.exp
index f5a933e521b..19cdec83193 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/shortpiece.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/shortpiece.exp
@@ -98,3 +98,15 @@ if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} \
 gdb_test "p s1" " = {a = 1, b = 0}"
 gdb_test "p s2" \
     "access outside bounds of object referenced via synthetic pointer"
+
+# When fetching a lazy value, GDB typically tries to fetch the 'full'
+# object based on the enclosing type.  GDB does not support the reading
+# of a pieced value with a (possibly larger) enclosing type.  However,
+# the user may want to print a value casted to a different type,
+# e.g. print (<type> []) <variable>.  This cast causes an update of the
+# value's type.  In case of a pieced value, GDB failed to fetch the
+# value's content.
+# This test verifies that GDB can print a pieced value casted to a
+# different type.
+gdb_test "p (int \[\]) s1" " = \\{1\\, 0\\}"
+gdb_test "p (short \[\]) s1" " = \\{1\\, 0\\, 0\\, <synthetic pointer>\\}"
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 14:44 [PATCH 0/1] " Stephan Rohr
2022-04-22 14:44 ` Stephan Rohr [this message]
2022-06-06 16:51   ` [PATCH 1/1] gdb/dwarf2: " Bruno Larsen
2022-07-14  7:50   ` Rohr, Stephan
2022-07-21 12:21   ` Rohr, Stephan
2022-08-02  6:30   ` Rohr, Stephan
2022-08-11  7:09   ` Rohr, Stephan
2022-08-19  7:41   ` Rohr, Stephan
2022-08-19 16:39   ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-11  8:03     ` Rohr, Stephan
2022-10-21 17:06       ` Tom Tromey
2022-10-14 18:28     ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220422144420.3545190-2-stephan.rohr@intel.com \
    --to=stephan.rohr@intel.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).