From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [pushed 1/8] [gdb/testsuite] Fix untested message in gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:20:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230313162051.488-2-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230313162051.488-1-tdevries@suse.de>
In test-case gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp, we have this bit:
...
require !use_gdb_stub
if { [target_info gdb_protocol] == "extended-remote" } {
untested "not supported"
return
}
...
So with target board native-gdbserver we get:
...
UNSUPPORTED: gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp: require failed: !use_gdb_stub
...
and with target board native-extended-gdbserver instead:
...
UNTESTED: gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp: not supported
...
Fix this by:
- adding an optional argument target_description to proc
target_can_use_run_cmd
- handling the target_description == core &&
[target_info gdb_protocol] == "extended-remote" case in the proc
- using require {target_can_use_run_cmd core}
such that now in both cases we have:
...
UNSUPPORTED: gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp: require failed: \
target_can_use_run_cmd core
...
Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp | 6 +-----
gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp
index 02606ee286d..2109a0ae3eb 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp
@@ -29,11 +29,7 @@ if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile debug] } {
}
# Only run on native boards.
-require !use_gdb_stub
-if { [target_info gdb_protocol] == "extended-remote" } {
- untested "not supported"
- return
-}
+require {target_can_use_run_cmd core}
if { ![runto_main] } {
return -1
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
index e2b08c64eae..23277c4ab79 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
@@ -385,13 +385,33 @@ proc delete_breakpoints {} {
# Returns true iff the target supports using the "run" command.
-proc target_can_use_run_cmd {} {
+proc target_can_use_run_cmd { {target_description ""} } {
+ if { $target_description == "" } {
+ set have_core 0
+ } elseif { $target_description == "core" } {
+ # We could try to figure this out by issuing an "info target" and
+ # checking for "Local core dump file:", but it would mean the proc
+ # would start requiring a current target. Also, uses while gdb
+ # produces non-standard output due to, say annotations would
+ # have to be moved around or eliminated, which would further limit
+ # usability.
+ set have_core 1
+ } else {
+ error "invalid argument: $target_description"
+ }
+
if [target_info exists use_gdb_stub] {
# In this case, when we connect, the inferior is already
# running.
return 0
}
+ if { $have_core && [target_info gdb_protocol] == "extended-remote" } {
+ # In this case, when we connect, the inferior is not running but
+ # cannot be made to run.
+ return 0
+ }
+
# Assume yes.
return 1
}
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-13 16:20 [pushed 0/8] [gdb/testsuite] Fix remote host issues in TUI tests Tom de Vries
2023-03-13 16:20 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2023-03-13 16:20 ` [pushed 2/8] [gdb/testsuite] Handle USE_TUI in gdb.tui/corefile-run.exp Tom de Vries
2023-03-13 16:20 ` [pushed 3/8] [gdb/testsuite] Require ![is_remote host] for TUI Tom de Vries
2023-03-13 16:20 ` [pushed 4/8] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.tui/tui-nl-filtered-output.exp for remote host Tom de Vries
2023-03-13 16:20 ` [pushed 5/8] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.tui/tui-layout.exp " Tom de Vries
2023-03-13 16:20 ` [pushed 6/8] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.tui/completion.exp for local-remote-host-notty Tom de Vries
2023-03-13 16:20 ` [pushed 7/8] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.python/tui-window.exp for remote host Tom de Vries
2023-03-13 16:20 ` [pushed 8/8] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.python/tui-window-factory.exp " Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230313162051.488-2-tdevries@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).