From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gdb: make "maintenance info line-table" show relocated addresses again
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:30:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230320163003.32960-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> (raw)
Commit 1acc9dca423f ("Change linetables to be objfile-independent")
changed "maintenance info line-table" to print unrelocated addresses
instead of relocated. This breaks a few tests on systems where that
matters. The ones I see are:
Running /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/consecutive.exp ...
FAIL: gdb.base/consecutive.exp: stopped at bp, 2nd instr (missing hex prefix)
Running /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/async.exp ...
FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: stepi&
FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: nexti&
FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: finish&
These tests run "maintenance info line-table" to record the address of
some lines, and then use these addresses in expected patterns.
For the time being, I suggest simply reverting the command to show
relocated addresses.
Change-Id: I59558f167e13e63421c9e0f2cad192e7c95c10cf
---
gdb/symmisc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/symmisc.c b/gdb/symmisc.c
index 54dc570d282f..8296857d06c3 100644
--- a/gdb/symmisc.c
+++ b/gdb/symmisc.c
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ maintenance_print_one_line_table (struct symtab *symtab, void *data)
else
uiout->field_string ("line", _("END"));
uiout->field_core_addr ("address", objfile->arch (),
- CORE_ADDR (item->raw_pc ()));
+ item->pc (objfile));
uiout->field_string ("is-stmt", item->is_stmt ? "Y" : "");
uiout->field_string ("prologue-end", item->prologue_end ? "Y" : "");
uiout->text ("\n");
--
2.40.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-20 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-20 16:30 Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-03-20 21:35 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-21 1:18 ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-21 9:23 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-03-22 1:35 ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-22 10:26 ` [PATCH 0/1] gdb: Update doc of the "maintenance info line-table" Lancelot SIX
2023-03-22 10:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Lancelot SIX
2023-03-22 13:59 ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-22 16:48 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-03-22 17:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Lancelot SIX
2023-03-22 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-22 13:46 ` [PATCH] gdb: make "maintenance info line-table" show relocated addresses again Tom de Vries
2023-03-22 13:47 ` Simon Marchi
2023-03-22 15:17 ` [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: adjust test cases to previous "maintenance info line-table" change Simon Marchi
2023-03-22 18:01 ` Tom de Vries
2023-03-22 19:14 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230320163003.32960-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--to=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).