public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: add xfail for gdb/29965 in gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
@ 2023-09-08  1:53 Simon Marchi
  2023-09-19 13:56 ` Simon Marchi
  2023-09-26 16:55 ` Tom de Vries
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2023-09-08  1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Simon Marchi

Bug 29965 shows on a Linux kernel >= 6.1, that test fails consistently
with:

    FAIL: gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp: iteration=0: continue (the program exited)
    ...
    FAIL: gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp: iteration=9: continue (the program exited)

This is due to a change in Linux kernel behavior [1] that affects
exactly what this test tests.  That is, if multiple threads (including
the leader) call SYS_exit, the exit status of the process should be the
exit status of the leader.  After that change in the kernel, it is no
longer the case.

Add an xfail in the test, based on the Linux kernel version.  The goal
is that if a regression is introduced in GDB regarding this feature, it
should be caught if running on an older kernel where the behavior was
consistent.

[1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206926

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29965
Change-Id: If6ab7171c92bfc1a3b961c7179e26611773969eb
---
 ...cess-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp | 21 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
index f64d6a73deaf..2bc73fdde07f 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
@@ -41,6 +41,25 @@ for {set iteration 0} {$iteration < 10} {incr iteration} {
 	    return
 	}
 
-	gdb_test "continue" "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code 01\\\]"
+	gdb_test_multiple "continue" "" {
+	    -re -wrap "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code 01\\\]" {
+		pass $gdb_test_name
+	    }
+
+	    -re -wrap "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code $::decimal\\\]" {
+		set lkv [linux_kernel_version]
+
+		if { [llength $lkv] != 0 } {
+		    lassign $lkv major minor patch
+
+		    if { ($major == 6 && $minor >= 1) || $major > 6 } {
+			xfail "$gdb_test_name (PR 29965)"
+			return
+		    }
+		}
+
+		fail $gdb_test_name
+	    }
+	}
     }
 }

base-commit: def2803789208a617c429b5dcf2026decb25ce0c
-- 
2.42.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: add xfail for gdb/29965 in gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
  2023-09-08  1:53 [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: add xfail for gdb/29965 in gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp Simon Marchi
@ 2023-09-19 13:56 ` Simon Marchi
  2023-09-26 16:55 ` Tom de Vries
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2023-09-19 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Simon Marchi, gdb-patches

Ping.

On 9/7/23 21:53, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Bug 29965 shows on a Linux kernel >= 6.1, that test fails consistently
> with:
> 
>     FAIL: gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp: iteration=0: continue (the program exited)
>     ...
>     FAIL: gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp: iteration=9: continue (the program exited)
> 
> This is due to a change in Linux kernel behavior [1] that affects
> exactly what this test tests.  That is, if multiple threads (including
> the leader) call SYS_exit, the exit status of the process should be the
> exit status of the leader.  After that change in the kernel, it is no
> longer the case.
> 
> Add an xfail in the test, based on the Linux kernel version.  The goal
> is that if a regression is introduced in GDB regarding this feature, it
> should be caught if running on an older kernel where the behavior was
> consistent.
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206926
> 
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29965
> Change-Id: If6ab7171c92bfc1a3b961c7179e26611773969eb
> ---
>  ...cess-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp | 21 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
> index f64d6a73deaf..2bc73fdde07f 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
> @@ -41,6 +41,25 @@ for {set iteration 0} {$iteration < 10} {incr iteration} {
>  	    return
>  	}
>  
> -	gdb_test "continue" "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code 01\\\]"
> +	gdb_test_multiple "continue" "" {
> +	    -re -wrap "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code 01\\\]" {
> +		pass $gdb_test_name
> +	    }
> +
> +	    -re -wrap "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code $::decimal\\\]" {
> +		set lkv [linux_kernel_version]
> +
> +		if { [llength $lkv] != 0 } {
> +		    lassign $lkv major minor patch
> +
> +		    if { ($major == 6 && $minor >= 1) || $major > 6 } {
> +			xfail "$gdb_test_name (PR 29965)"
> +			return
> +		    }
> +		}
> +
> +		fail $gdb_test_name
> +	    }
> +	}
>      }
>  }
> 
> base-commit: def2803789208a617c429b5dcf2026decb25ce0c
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: add xfail for gdb/29965 in gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
  2023-09-08  1:53 [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: add xfail for gdb/29965 in gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp Simon Marchi
  2023-09-19 13:56 ` Simon Marchi
@ 2023-09-26 16:55 ` Tom de Vries
  2023-09-26 18:22   ` Simon Marchi
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom de Vries @ 2023-09-26 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Simon Marchi, gdb-patches

On 9/8/23 03:53, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Bug 29965 shows on a Linux kernel >= 6.1, that test fails consistently
> with:
> 
>      FAIL: gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp: iteration=0: continue (the program exited)
>      ...
>      FAIL: gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp: iteration=9: continue (the program exited)
> 
> This is due to a change in Linux kernel behavior [1] that affects
> exactly what this test tests.  That is, if multiple threads (including
> the leader) call SYS_exit, the exit status of the process should be the
> exit status of the leader.  After that change in the kernel, it is no
> longer the case.
> 
> Add an xfail in the test, based on the Linux kernel version.  The goal
> is that if a regression is introduced in GDB regarding this feature, it
> should be caught if running on an older kernel where the behavior was
> consistent.
> 

Hi,

thanks for doing this.

I've rebooted into tumbleweed, applied the patch and confirmed that the 
xfail is triggered.

> [1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206926
> 
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29965
> Change-Id: If6ab7171c92bfc1a3b961c7179e26611773969eb
> ---
>   ...cess-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp | 21 ++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
> index f64d6a73deaf..2bc73fdde07f 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
> @@ -41,6 +41,25 @@ for {set iteration 0} {$iteration < 10} {incr iteration} {
>   	    return
>   	}
>   
> -	gdb_test "continue" "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code 01\\\]"
> +	gdb_test_multiple "continue" "" {
> +	    -re -wrap "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code 01\\\]" {
> +		pass $gdb_test_name
> +	    }
> +
> +	    -re -wrap "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code $::decimal\\\]" {
> +		set lkv [linux_kernel_version]
> +
> +		if { [llength $lkv] != 0 } {
> +		    lassign $lkv major minor patch
> +
> +		    if { ($major == 6 && $minor >= 1) || $major > 6 } {

You could consider using version_compare here, but it's no requirement.

LGTM.

Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>

Thanks,
- Tom

> +			xfail "$gdb_test_name (PR 29965)"
> +			return
> +		    }
> +		}
> +
> +		fail $gdb_test_name
> +	    }
> +	}
>       }
>   }
> 
> base-commit: def2803789208a617c429b5dcf2026decb25ce0c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: add xfail for gdb/29965 in gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
  2023-09-26 16:55 ` Tom de Vries
@ 2023-09-26 18:22   ` Simon Marchi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2023-09-26 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom de Vries, Simon Marchi, gdb-patches

On 9/26/23 12:55, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote:
> On 9/8/23 03:53, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> Bug 29965 shows on a Linux kernel >= 6.1, that test fails consistently
>> with:
>>
>>      FAIL: gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp: iteration=0: continue (the program exited)
>>      ...
>>      FAIL: gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp: iteration=9: continue (the program exited)
>>
>> This is due to a change in Linux kernel behavior [1] that affects
>> exactly what this test tests.  That is, if multiple threads (including
>> the leader) call SYS_exit, the exit status of the process should be the
>> exit status of the leader.  After that change in the kernel, it is no
>> longer the case.
>>
>> Add an xfail in the test, based on the Linux kernel version.  The goal
>> is that if a regression is introduced in GDB regarding this feature, it
>> should be caught if running on an older kernel where the behavior was
>> consistent.
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for doing this.
> 
> I've rebooted into tumbleweed, applied the patch and confirmed that the xfail is triggered.

Thanks!

> 
>> [1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206926
>>
>> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29965
>> Change-Id: If6ab7171c92bfc1a3b961c7179e26611773969eb
>> ---
>>   ...cess-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp | 21 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
>> index f64d6a73deaf..2bc73fdde07f 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp
>> @@ -41,6 +41,25 @@ for {set iteration 0} {$iteration < 10} {incr iteration} {
>>           return
>>       }
>>   -    gdb_test "continue" "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code 01\\\]"
>> +    gdb_test_multiple "continue" "" {
>> +        -re -wrap "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code 01\\\]" {
>> +        pass $gdb_test_name
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        -re -wrap "\\\[Inferior 1 \\(.*\\) exited with code $::decimal\\\]" {
>> +        set lkv [linux_kernel_version]
>> +
>> +        if { [llength $lkv] != 0 } {
>> +            lassign $lkv major minor patch
>> +
>> +            if { ($major == 6 && $minor >= 1) || $major > 6 } {
> 
> You could consider using version_compare here, but it's no requirement.
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>

I didn't know about version_compare, I changed the code to use it and
pushed the patch, thanks!

Simon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-26 18:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-08  1:53 [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: add xfail for gdb/29965 in gdb.threads/process-exit-status-is-leader-exit-status.exp Simon Marchi
2023-09-19 13:56 ` Simon Marchi
2023-09-26 16:55 ` Tom de Vries
2023-09-26 18:22   ` Simon Marchi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).