From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] gdb: add assertion when marking the remote async flag
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 22:04:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231004020701.260411-4-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004020701.260411-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
As reported in bug 30630 [1], we hit a case where the remote target's
async flag is marked while the target is not configured (yet) to work
async. This should not happen. It is caught thanks to this assert in
remote_target::wait:
/* Start by clearing the flag that asks for our wait method to be called,
we'll mark it again at the end if needed. If the target is not in
async mode then the async token should not be marked. */
if (target_is_async_p ())
rs->clear_async_event_handler ();
else
gdb_assert (!rs->async_event_handler_marked ());
This is helpful, but I think that we could have caught the problem earlier than
that, at the moment we marked the handler. Catching problems earlier
makes them easier to debug.
[1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30630
Change-Id: I7e229c74b04da82bef6a817d5a676be5cf52e833
---
gdb/remote.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
index 38d0027dbf9e..7830b5cec33f 100644
--- a/gdb/remote.c
+++ b/gdb/remote.c
@@ -424,7 +424,10 @@ class remote_state
}
void mark_async_event_handler ()
- { ::mark_async_event_handler (m_async_event_handler_token); }
+ {
+ gdb_assert (this->is_async_p ());
+ ::mark_async_event_handler (m_async_event_handler_token);
+ }
void clear_async_event_handler ()
{ ::clear_async_event_handler (m_async_event_handler_token); }
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-04 2:03 [PATCH 0/3] Add " Simon Marchi
2023-10-04 2:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] gdb: make remote_state's async token private Simon Marchi
2023-10-09 9:11 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-10-10 14:56 ` Simon Marchi
2023-10-04 2:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] gdb: add remote_state::{is_async_p,can_async_p} Simon Marchi
2023-10-09 9:20 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-10-10 15:01 ` Simon Marchi
2023-10-04 2:04 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2023-10-06 21:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] gdb: add assertion when marking the remote async flag Terekhov, Mikhail
2023-10-07 1:35 ` Simon Marchi
2023-10-09 9:25 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-10-10 15:01 ` Simon Marchi
2023-10-06 21:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add " Terekhov, Mikhail
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231004020701.260411-4-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).