public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block, part 2
Date: Thu,  9 Nov 2023 16:00:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231109150021.5504-4-tdevries@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231109150021.5504-1-tdevries@suse.de>

The previous commit describes PR gdb/30547, a segfault when running test-case
gdb.base/vfork-follow-parent.exp on powerpc64 (likewise on s390x).

The root cause for the segmentation fault is that linux_is_uclinux gives an
incorrect result: it returns true instead of false.

So, why does linux_is_uclinux:
...
int
linux_is_uclinux (void)
{
  CORE_ADDR dummy;

  return (target_auxv_search (AT_NULL, &dummy) > 0
	  && target_auxv_search (AT_PAGESZ, &dummy) == 0);
...
return true?

This is because ppc_linux_target_wordsize returns 4 instead of 8, causing
ppc_linux_nat_target::auxv_parse to misinterpret the auxv vector.

So, why does ppc_linux_target_wordsize:
...
int
ppc_linux_target_wordsize (int tid)
{
  int wordsize = 4;

  /* Check for 64-bit inferior process.	 This is the case when the host is
     64-bit, and in addition the top bit of the MSR register is set.  */
  long msr;

  errno = 0;
  msr = (long) ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, tid, PT_MSR * 8, 0);
  if (errno == 0 && ppc64_64bit_inferior_p (msr))
    wordsize = 8;

  return wordsize;
}
...
return 4?

Specifically, we get this result because because tid == 0, so we get
errno == ESRCH.

The tid == 0 is caused by the switch_to_no_thread in
handle_vfork_child_exec_or_exit:
...
	  /* Switch to no-thread while running clone_program_space, so
	     that clone_program_space doesn't want to read the
	     selected frame of a dead process.  */
	  scoped_restore_current_thread restore_thread;
	  switch_to_no_thread ();

	  inf->pspace = new program_space (maybe_new_address_space ());
...
but moving the maybe_new_address_space call to before that gives us the
same result.  The tid is no longer 0, but we still get ESRCH because the
thread has exited.

Fix this in handle_vfork_child_exec_or_exit by doing the
maybe_new_address_space call in the context of the vfork parent.

Tested on top of trunk on x86_64-linux and ppc64le-linux.
Tested on top of gdb-14-branch on ppc64-linux.

PR gdb/30547
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30547
---
 gdb/infrun.c         | 16 +++++++++++-----
 gdb/nat/ppc-linux.c  |  2 ++
 gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c  |  2 ++
 gdb/s390-linux-nat.c |  5 ++++-
 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index 34c495097e5..5c9f8003e2b 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -1106,13 +1106,19 @@ handle_vfork_child_exec_or_exit (int exec)
 	     go ahead and create a new one for this exiting
 	     inferior.  */
 
-	  /* Switch to no-thread while running clone_program_space, so
-	     that clone_program_space doesn't want to read the
-	     selected frame of a dead process.  */
 	  scoped_restore_current_thread restore_thread;
-	  switch_to_no_thread ();
 
-	  inf->pspace = new program_space (maybe_new_address_space ());
+	  /* Temporarily switch to the vfork parent, to facilitate ptrace
+	     calls done during maybe_new_address_space.  */
+	  switch_to_thread (any_live_thread_of_inferior (vfork_parent));
+	  std::shared_ptr<address_space> aspace = maybe_new_address_space ();
+
+	  /* Switch back to the vfork child inferior.  Switch to no-thread
+	     while running clone_program_space, so that clone_program_space
+	     doesn't want to read the selected frame of a dead process.  */
+	  switch_to_inferior_no_thread (inf);
+
+	  inf->pspace = new program_space (std::move (aspace));
 	  inf->aspace = inf->pspace->aspace;
 	  set_current_program_space (inf->pspace);
 	  inf->removable = true;
diff --git a/gdb/nat/ppc-linux.c b/gdb/nat/ppc-linux.c
index 0957d1b58a7..74549754806 100644
--- a/gdb/nat/ppc-linux.c
+++ b/gdb/nat/ppc-linux.c
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ ppc64_64bit_inferior_p (long msr)
 int
 ppc_linux_target_wordsize (int tid)
 {
+  gdb_assert (tid != 0);
+
   int wordsize = 4;
 
   /* Check for 64-bit inferior process.  This is the case when the host is
diff --git a/gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c b/gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c
index a0205119f00..70dd20ad963 100644
--- a/gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c
+++ b/gdb/ppc-linux-nat.c
@@ -1914,6 +1914,8 @@ ppc_linux_nat_target::auxv_parse (const gdb_byte **readptr,
 				  const gdb_byte *endptr, CORE_ADDR *typep,
 				  CORE_ADDR *valp)
 {
+  gdb_assert (inferior_ptid != null_ptid);
+
   int tid = inferior_ptid.lwp ();
   if (tid == 0)
     tid = inferior_ptid.pid ();
diff --git a/gdb/s390-linux-nat.c b/gdb/s390-linux-nat.c
index 0aa3edea8aa..1a94ce487c3 100644
--- a/gdb/s390-linux-nat.c
+++ b/gdb/s390-linux-nat.c
@@ -949,10 +949,12 @@ s390_target_wordsize (void)
   /* Check for 64-bit inferior process.  This is the case when the host is
      64-bit, and in addition bit 32 of the PSW mask is set.  */
 #ifdef __s390x__
+  int tid = s390_inferior_tid ();
+  gdb_assert (tid == 0);
   long pswm;
 
   errno = 0;
-  pswm = (long) ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, s390_inferior_tid (), PT_PSWMASK, 0);
+  pswm = (long) ptrace (PTRACE_PEEKUSER, tid, PT_PSWMASK, 0);
   if (errno == 0 && (pswm & 0x100000000ul) != 0)
     wordsize = 8;
 #endif
@@ -965,6 +967,7 @@ s390_linux_nat_target::auxv_parse (const gdb_byte **readptr,
 				   const gdb_byte *endptr, CORE_ADDR *typep,
 				   CORE_ADDR *valp)
 {
+  gdb_assert (inferior_ptid != null_ptid);
   int sizeof_auxv_field = s390_target_wordsize ();
   bfd_endian byte_order = gdbarch_byte_order (current_inferior ()->arch ());
   const gdb_byte *ptr = *readptr;
-- 
2.35.3


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-09 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-09 15:00 [PATCH v3 0/3] [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block Tom de Vries
2023-11-09 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] [gdb] Fix segfault in for_each_block, part 1 Tom de Vries
2023-11-09 18:19   ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-10  8:14     ` Tom de Vries
2023-11-09 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] [gdb] Eliminate local var pspace in inferior.c Tom de Vries
2023-11-09 16:31   ` Simon Marchi
2023-11-10  8:15     ` Tom de Vries
2023-11-09 15:00 ` Tom de Vries [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231109150021.5504-4-tdevries@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).