* [PATCH] Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frame
[not found] <20240106141735.2330-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
@ 2024-01-06 14:17 ` Hannes Domani
2024-01-17 16:05 ` [PING] " Hannes Domani
2024-01-29 10:55 ` Andrew Burgess
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Domani @ 2024-01-06 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
If you have set up a backtrace limit, and the backtrace stops
because of this in an inline frame with arguments, you get an
assertion failure:
```
(gdb) bt
#0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
#1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
#2 main () at gdb-29865.c:14
(gdb) set backtrace limit 2
(gdb) bt
#0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
#1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (
C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/frame.c:3346: internal-error: reinflate: Assertion `m_cached_level >= -1' failed.
```
And if this one if fixed, there is another one as well:
```
(gdb) bt
#0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
#1 0x000000013fdf162a in inline_frame (
C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c:1160: internal-error: dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter: Assertion `frame != NULL' failed.
```
The reason for both of them is this kind of loop:
```
while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
```
Since get_prev_frame respects the backtrace limit, it will return
NULL, and from there on you can't continue.
This changes these loops to use get_prev_frame_always instead, so
you always get a non-inline frame in the end.
With this backtrace works:
```
(gdb) bt
#0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
#1 0x000000013fd4162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
(gdb)
```
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29865
---
gdb/dwarf2/frame.c | 2 +-
gdb/dwarf2/loc.c | 2 +-
gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c | 8 ++++----
gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp | 1 +
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
index d3d1ecdf1f5..143b934e5ef 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ dwarf2_frame_cfa (frame_info_ptr this_frame)
_("cfa not available for record btrace target"));
while (get_frame_type (this_frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
- this_frame = get_prev_frame (this_frame);
+ this_frame = get_prev_frame_always (this_frame);
if (get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (this_frame) == UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE)
throw_error (NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR,
_("can't compute CFA for this frame: "
diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c b/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
index c15221eb7a2..b1f188bf9c5 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
@@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter (frame_info_ptr frame,
while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
{
- frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
+ frame = get_prev_frame_always (frame);
gdb_assert (frame != NULL);
}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
index 8dac8d30300..0dad0f47e6e 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
@@ -28,15 +28,15 @@ volatile int result;
void bar(void);
-inline ATTR int func1(void)
+inline ATTR int func1(int s)
{
bar ();
- return x * y;
+ return x * y + s;
}
inline ATTR int func2(void)
{
- return x * func1 ();
+ return x * func1 (1);
}
int main (void)
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int main (void)
y = 8;
bar ();
- val = func1 ();
+ val = func1 (2);
result = val;
val = func2 ();
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
index 501b24109e3..b0e5f61a5c7 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
@@ -65,3 +65,4 @@ gdb_test "up" "#1 .*func1.*" "up from bar (4)"
gdb_test "info frame" ".*in func1.*" "info frame still works"
# Verify the user visible limit works as expected.
gdb_test "up" "Initial frame selected; you cannot go up." "up hits limit"
+gdb_test "backtrace" "#0 bar.*#1 .*func1.*" "backtrace hits limit"
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PING] [PATCH] Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frame
2024-01-06 14:17 ` [PATCH] Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frame Hannes Domani
@ 2024-01-17 16:05 ` Hannes Domani
2024-01-26 17:05 ` Hannes Domani
2024-01-29 10:55 ` Andrew Burgess
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Domani @ 2024-01-17 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Ping.
On 06.01.2024 15:17, Hannes Domani wrote:
> If you have set up a backtrace limit, and the backtrace stops
> because of this in an inline frame with arguments, you get an
> assertion failure:
> ```
> (gdb) bt
> #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> #1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
> #2 main () at gdb-29865.c:14
> (gdb) set backtrace limit 2
> (gdb) bt
> #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> #1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (
> C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/frame.c:3346: internal-error: reinflate: Assertion `m_cached_level >= -1' failed.
> ```
>
> And if this one if fixed, there is another one as well:
> ```
> (gdb) bt
> #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> #1 0x000000013fdf162a in inline_frame (
> C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c:1160: internal-error: dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter: Assertion `frame != NULL' failed.
> ```
>
> The reason for both of them is this kind of loop:
> ```
> while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
> ```
> Since get_prev_frame respects the backtrace limit, it will return
> NULL, and from there on you can't continue.
> This changes these loops to use get_prev_frame_always instead, so
> you always get a non-inline frame in the end.
>
> With this backtrace works:
> ```
> (gdb) bt
> #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> #1 0x000000013fd4162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
> (gdb)
> ```
>
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29865
> ---
> gdb/dwarf2/frame.c | 2 +-
> gdb/dwarf2/loc.c | 2 +-
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c | 8 ++++----
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> index d3d1ecdf1f5..143b934e5ef 100644
> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ dwarf2_frame_cfa (frame_info_ptr this_frame)
> _("cfa not available for record btrace target"));
>
> while (get_frame_type (this_frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> - this_frame = get_prev_frame (this_frame);
> + this_frame = get_prev_frame_always (this_frame);
> if (get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (this_frame) == UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE)
> throw_error (NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR,
> _("can't compute CFA for this frame: "
> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c b/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> index c15221eb7a2..b1f188bf9c5 100644
> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter (frame_info_ptr frame,
>
> while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> {
> - frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
> + frame = get_prev_frame_always (frame);
> gdb_assert (frame != NULL);
> }
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> index 8dac8d30300..0dad0f47e6e 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> @@ -28,15 +28,15 @@ volatile int result;
>
> void bar(void);
>
> -inline ATTR int func1(void)
> +inline ATTR int func1(int s)
> {
> bar ();
> - return x * y;
> + return x * y + s;
> }
>
> inline ATTR int func2(void)
> {
> - return x * func1 ();
> + return x * func1 (1);
> }
>
> int main (void)
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int main (void)
> y = 8;
> bar ();
>
> - val = func1 ();
> + val = func1 (2);
> result = val;
>
> val = func2 ();
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> index 501b24109e3..b0e5f61a5c7 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> @@ -65,3 +65,4 @@ gdb_test "up" "#1 .*func1.*" "up from bar (4)"
> gdb_test "info frame" ".*in func1.*" "info frame still works"
> # Verify the user visible limit works as expected.
> gdb_test "up" "Initial frame selected; you cannot go up." "up hits limit"
> +gdb_test "backtrace" "#0 bar.*#1 .*func1.*" "backtrace hits limit"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PING] [PATCH] Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frame
2024-01-17 16:05 ` [PING] " Hannes Domani
@ 2024-01-26 17:05 ` Hannes Domani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Domani @ 2024-01-26 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Ping.
Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 17:06:12 MEZ hat Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> Folgendes geschrieben:
> Ping.
>
>
> On 06.01.2024 15:17, Hannes Domani wrote:
> > If you have set up a backtrace limit, and the backtrace stops
> > because of this in an inline frame with arguments, you get an
> > assertion failure:
> > ```
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> > #1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
> > #2 main () at gdb-29865.c:14
> > (gdb) set backtrace limit 2
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> > #1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (
> > C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/frame.c:3346: internal-error: reinflate: Assertion `m_cached_level >= -1' failed.
> > ```
> >
> > And if this one if fixed, there is another one as well:
> > ```
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> > #1 0x000000013fdf162a in inline_frame (
> > C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c:1160: internal-error: dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter: Assertion `frame != NULL' failed.
> > ```
> >
> > The reason for both of them is this kind of loop:
> > ```
> > while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> > frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
> > ```
> > Since get_prev_frame respects the backtrace limit, it will return
> > NULL, and from there on you can't continue.
> > This changes these loops to use get_prev_frame_always instead, so
> > you always get a non-inline frame in the end.
> >
> > With this backtrace works:
> > ```
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> > #1 0x000000013fd4162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
> > (gdb)
> > ```
> >
> > Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29865
> > ---
> > gdb/dwarf2/frame.c | 2 +-
> > gdb/dwarf2/loc.c | 2 +-
> > gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c | 8 ++++----
> > gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> > index d3d1ecdf1f5..143b934e5ef 100644
> > --- a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> > +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> > @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ dwarf2_frame_cfa (frame_info_ptr this_frame)
> > _("cfa not available for record btrace target"));
> >
> > while (get_frame_type (this_frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> > - this_frame = get_prev_frame (this_frame);
> > + this_frame = get_prev_frame_always (this_frame);
> > if (get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (this_frame) == UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE)
> > throw_error (NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR,
> > _("can't compute CFA for this frame: "
> > diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c b/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> > index c15221eb7a2..b1f188bf9c5 100644
> > --- a/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> > +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> > @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter (frame_info_ptr frame,
> >
> > while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> > {
> > - frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
> > + frame = get_prev_frame_always (frame);
> > gdb_assert (frame != NULL);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> > index 8dac8d30300..0dad0f47e6e 100644
> > --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> > +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> > @@ -28,15 +28,15 @@ volatile int result;
> >
> > void bar(void);
> >
> > -inline ATTR int func1(void)
> > +inline ATTR int func1(int s)
> > {
> > bar ();
> > - return x * y;
> > + return x * y + s;
> > }
> >
> > inline ATTR int func2(void)
> > {
> > - return x * func1 ();
> > + return x * func1 (1);
> > }
> >
> > int main (void)
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int main (void)
> > y = 8;
> > bar ();
> >
> > - val = func1 ();
> > + val = func1 (2);
> > result = val;
> >
> > val = func2 ();
> > diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> > index 501b24109e3..b0e5f61a5c7 100644
> > --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> > +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> > @@ -65,3 +65,4 @@ gdb_test "up" "#1 .*func1.*" "up from bar (4)"
> > gdb_test "info frame" ".*in func1.*" "info frame still works"
> > # Verify the user visible limit works as expected.
> > gdb_test "up" "Initial frame selected; you cannot go up." "up hits limit"
> > +gdb_test "backtrace" "#0 bar.*#1 .*func1.*" "backtrace hits limit"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frame
2024-01-06 14:17 ` [PATCH] Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frame Hannes Domani
2024-01-17 16:05 ` [PING] " Hannes Domani
@ 2024-01-29 10:55 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-01-29 14:35 ` Hannes Domani
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Burgess @ 2024-01-29 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hannes Domani, gdb-patches
Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> writes:
> If you have set up a backtrace limit, and the backtrace stops
> because of this in an inline frame with arguments, you get an
> assertion failure:
> ```
> (gdb) bt
> #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> #1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
> #2 main () at gdb-29865.c:14
> (gdb) set backtrace limit 2
> (gdb) bt
> #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> #1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (
> C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/frame.c:3346: internal-error: reinflate: Assertion `m_cached_level >= -1' failed.
> ```
>
> And if this one if fixed, there is another one as well:
s/one if fixed/one is fixed/.
Otherwise, looks good. Thanks for fixing this.
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Andrew
> ```
> (gdb) bt
> #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> #1 0x000000013fdf162a in inline_frame (
> C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c:1160: internal-error: dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter: Assertion `frame != NULL' failed.
> ```
>
> The reason for both of them is this kind of loop:
> ```
> while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
> ```
> Since get_prev_frame respects the backtrace limit, it will return
> NULL, and from there on you can't continue.
> This changes these loops to use get_prev_frame_always instead, so
> you always get a non-inline frame in the end.
>
> With this backtrace works:
> ```
> (gdb) bt
> #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> #1 0x000000013fd4162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
> (gdb)
> ```
>
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29865
> ---
> gdb/dwarf2/frame.c | 2 +-
> gdb/dwarf2/loc.c | 2 +-
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c | 8 ++++----
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> index d3d1ecdf1f5..143b934e5ef 100644
> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> @@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ dwarf2_frame_cfa (frame_info_ptr this_frame)
> _("cfa not available for record btrace target"));
>
> while (get_frame_type (this_frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> - this_frame = get_prev_frame (this_frame);
> + this_frame = get_prev_frame_always (this_frame);
> if (get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (this_frame) == UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE)
> throw_error (NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR,
> _("can't compute CFA for this frame: "
> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c b/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> index c15221eb7a2..b1f188bf9c5 100644
> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter (frame_info_ptr frame,
>
> while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
> {
> - frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
> + frame = get_prev_frame_always (frame);
> gdb_assert (frame != NULL);
> }
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> index 8dac8d30300..0dad0f47e6e 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.c
> @@ -28,15 +28,15 @@ volatile int result;
>
> void bar(void);
>
> -inline ATTR int func1(void)
> +inline ATTR int func1(int s)
> {
> bar ();
> - return x * y;
> + return x * y + s;
> }
>
> inline ATTR int func2(void)
> {
> - return x * func1 ();
> + return x * func1 (1);
> }
>
> int main (void)
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int main (void)
> y = 8;
> bar ();
>
> - val = func1 ();
> + val = func1 (2);
> result = val;
>
> val = func2 ();
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> index 501b24109e3..b0e5f61a5c7 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/inline-bt.exp
> @@ -65,3 +65,4 @@ gdb_test "up" "#1 .*func1.*" "up from bar (4)"
> gdb_test "info frame" ".*in func1.*" "info frame still works"
> # Verify the user visible limit works as expected.
> gdb_test "up" "Initial frame selected; you cannot go up." "up hits limit"
> +gdb_test "backtrace" "#0 bar.*#1 .*func1.*" "backtrace hits limit"
> --
> 2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frame
2024-01-29 10:55 ` Andrew Burgess
@ 2024-01-29 14:35 ` Hannes Domani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Domani @ 2024-01-29 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches, Andrew Burgess
Am Montag, 29. Januar 2024 um 11:55:14 MEZ hat Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> Folgendes geschrieben:
> Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> writes:
>
> > If you have set up a backtrace limit, and the backtrace stops
> > because of this in an inline frame with arguments, you get an
> > assertion failure:
> > ```
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> > #1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:9
> > #2 main () at gdb-29865.c:14
> > (gdb) set backtrace limit 2
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 normal_frame (i=0) at gdb-29865.c:4
> > #1 0x000000013fe3162a in inline_frame (
> > C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/frame.c:3346: internal-error: reinflate: Assertion `m_cached_level >= -1' failed.
> > ```
> >
> > And if this one if fixed, there is another one as well:
>
> s/one if fixed/one is fixed/.
>
> Otherwise, looks good. Thanks for fixing this.
>
> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Pushed with this typo fixed, thanks.
Hannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-29 14:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20240106141735.2330-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
2024-01-06 14:17 ` [PATCH] Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frame Hannes Domani
2024-01-17 16:05 ` [PING] " Hannes Domani
2024-01-26 17:05 ` Hannes Domani
2024-01-29 10:55 ` Andrew Burgess
2024-01-29 14:35 ` Hannes Domani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).