public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	"tdevries@suse.de" <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: "kevinb@redhat.com" <kevinb@redhat.com>,
	"will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com" <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>,
	"blarsen@redhat.com" <blarsen@redhat.com>,
	cel@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 ver 3] PowerPC, fix support for printing the function return value for non-trivial values.
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:24:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2466b7efc91dd4964add9a0d7ce4cd47678f5800.camel@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ed2cf1714e5b8dc386e66b634b540efdf828ed5.camel@de.ibm.com>

Tom, Ulrich:

On Tue, 2022-11-15 at 10:16 +0000, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> wrote:
> > On 11/14/22 17:47, Ulrich Weigand via Gdb-patches wrote:
> > > I believe all of Kevin's and Bruno's comments have been addressed
> > > in this version.  I've reviewed it myself as well, and it looks
> > > good to me.
> > > This is OK.
> > On x86_64-linux, I run into a segfault:
> > [...]
> > (gdb) up
> > #1  0x0000000000852d94 in finish_command (arg=0x0, from_tty=0)
> >     at /home/vries/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/infcmd.c:1887
> > 1887        = check_typedef (sm->function->type ()->target_type
> > ());
> > (gdb) p sm->function
> > $1 = (symbol *) 0x0
> 
> Ah, I missed that possibility, sorry.
> 
> Carl, if sm->function is NULL, then the whole check needs
> to be skipped, and sm->return_buf should be set to 0.
> 
> Can you come up with a fix along those lines (or else,
> just revert the patch for now)?   Thanks!
> 

I tested the last mainline code with the command on an X86-64 box.

   make check RUNTESTFLAGS='GDB=/home/carll/bin/gdb  gdb.asm/asm-source.exp  '

Which generated an error.  I then ran the command, from Tom's email:

 gdb -q -batch -x outputs/gdb.asm/asm-source/gdb.in.1

from directory gdb/testsuite which generated a segmentation fault as
expected.

Once I applied the following patch, recompiled and retested, the make
check seemed to run fine and the gdb -q batch test ran without
generating a segmentation fault.

The patch appears to fix the issue.  Not sure why this didn't show up
in my original X86 testing?  I will go back and look some more to see
if I can track down why I didn't see the issue.

Sorry for the bug.  

Tom, can you take a look at the patch and try it out to make sure it
fixes the issues on your system.  Thanks.

                  Carl Love

----------------------------------------------------------------
Bug fix in commit for printing the function return value for non-trivial values

The recent commit:

  commit a0eda3df5b750ae32576a9be092b361281a41787
  Author: Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
  Date:   Mon Nov 14 16:22:37 2022 -0500

    PowerPC, fix support for printing the function return value for non-trivial values.

Is generating a segmentation fault on x86_64-linux.

  segfault:
  ...
  PASS: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: info source asmsrc1.s
  ERROR: GDB process no longer exists
  UNRESOLVED: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp: finish from foo3
  ...

  Reproduced on command line:
  ...
  $ gdb -q -batch -x outputs/gdb.asm/asm-source/gdb.in.1
  ...

  The problem seems to be that:
  ...
  Thread 1 "gdb" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  0x000000000043de7a in symbol::type (this=0x0) at
  .../gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/symtab.h:1287
  1287        return m_type;
  ...
  because:
  ...
  (gdb) up
  #1  0x0000000000852d94 in finish_command (arg=0x0, from_tty=0)
     at .../gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/infcmd.c:1887
  1887        = check_typedef (sm->function->type ()->target_type ());
  (gdb) p sm->function
  $1 = (symbol *) 0x0

The code is not checking if sm->function is NULL.  If sm->function is NULL
the check for the return buffer should be skipped.
---
 gdb/infcmd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/infcmd.c b/gdb/infcmd.c
index b71dc10370b..2876f6d9c9d 100644
--- a/gdb/infcmd.c
+++ b/gdb/infcmd.c
@@ -1880,23 +1880,28 @@ finish_command (const char *arg, int from_tty)
 
   /* Determine the return convention.  If it is RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION,
      attempt to determine the address of the return buffer.  */
-  enum return_value_convention return_value;
-  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (callee_frame);
+  if (sm->function != NULL)
+    {
+      enum return_value_convention return_value;
+      struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (callee_frame);
 
-  struct type * val_type
-    = check_typedef (sm->function->type ()->target_type ());
+      struct type * val_type
+	= check_typedef (sm->function->type ()->target_type ());
 
-  return_value = gdbarch_return_value (gdbarch,
-				       read_var_value (sm->function, NULL,
-						       callee_frame),
-				       val_type, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+      return_value = gdbarch_return_value (gdbarch,
+					   read_var_value (sm->function, NULL,
+							   callee_frame),
+					   val_type, NULL, NULL, NULL);
 
-  if (return_value == RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION
-      && val_type->code () != TYPE_CODE_VOID)
-    sm->return_buf = gdbarch_get_return_buf_addr (gdbarch, val_type,
-						  callee_frame);
+      if (return_value == RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION
+	  && val_type->code () != TYPE_CODE_VOID)
+	sm->return_buf = gdbarch_get_return_buf_addr (gdbarch, val_type,
+						      callee_frame);
+      else
+	sm->return_buf = 0;
+    }
   else
-    sm->return_buf = 0;
+    sm->return_buf = 0;  /* Return buffer address is not available.  */
 
   /* Print info on the selected frame, including level number but not
      source.  */
-- 
2.31.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-15 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-11 22:26 [PATCH] PowerPC, add support for printing non-trivial C++ object for the finish command Carl Love
2022-03-13  5:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2022-03-14 10:43 ` Luis Machado
2022-03-14 13:40 ` Tom Tromey
2022-03-14 13:45   ` Luis Machado
2022-03-14 14:58   ` Ulrich Weigand
     [not found]     ` <ce6c71356c4a58fcdfb655a6e50c3a24f812e66c.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]       ` <d9f17525c9a03c20b54015a6a71c36cae50fe4e3.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]         ` <6ca2276426343756e103995e07ff951d6e26837b.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]           ` <939797b94ab71f3f7356747d84a1515939cb3dcc.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]             ` <fccc34c438fda9a35b8a8565e0f5026237e7eab9.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]               ` <bb5b9b137fc11886964113d4b524526b3c733f4a.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                 ` <1edb818bd2873a3fa5278f28131089d228a0a4f6.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                   ` <7c884a865d06890cb325225c65d7a52fdfbd20d2.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                     ` <846ca96309d2732d3db0e4c323a81105c098fa5f.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                       ` <5a858dd7b957ecf45cf5b00ffc140a839c8ef023.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                         ` <b634fecae5e33a3d1a278191c37f306a3b8622f2.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                           ` <25f2380ced176f58a8e3ea9b70c7e7786988d650.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                             ` <2b0481466e9ecc33d52c74c3a3b4babb05435f47.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                               ` <df3b049416ff666e7bd3e3a91e4ea90d34256ea5.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                 ` <71370ce02bd57827d3b7958772b1594d3591bd16.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                   ` <ec9dafb1671699b03b28ee4be528711c6988eaa5.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                     ` <148d8d3efcc8d110119e566027bfd0c65dd02525.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                       ` <eef62b295e97fc464c22f9d748ff818860137de9.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                         ` <afd6fa576f479359618b1ee50b08be8932735da8.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                           ` <cb6b19e9d287d2bae4b72627791f2a00af062c48.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                             ` <ee7101f86b5c8581905c53347fa603dc23ddc2bd.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                               ` <8decd662134d57e8caf43960a1cdc47723e2bfe3.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                 ` <f7cad695cf64540bad8c95cf5fd31691711d0eeb.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                   ` <79d82ed277308ed5ce312bff398e770ab234390a.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                     ` <63f21a897f452d81a73fb386cb99110a359ef0b7.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                       ` <be178bc4f356d7f1937458290cb5883eeee9eee1.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                         ` <dfd935e9414d3dd2c27d1e877d3718ae7510aa07.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                           ` <97275f61ef101a12cde8e5a45008ed8e479424eb.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                             ` <b629440707165f46fb466e48b0c95de3bfa334d2.camel@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                               ` <5a34aaeab59f0099b915d1780c701284a6cf691e.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                                 ` <8aa882863b2f4cef38c22386387c5705bf63c3d5.camel@de.ibm.com>
2022-10-06 16:37                                                                   ` [PATCH 1/2] PowerPC, function ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value add missing return value convention Carl Love
2022-10-08  4:20                                                                     ` Kevin Buettner
2022-10-14 23:20                                                                       ` Carl Love
2022-10-18 18:55                                                                     ` [PATCH 1/2 ver 2] " Carl Love
2022-11-07 20:04                                                                       ` [PATCH 1/2 ver 3] " Carl Love
2022-11-14 16:45                                                                         ` Ulrich Weigand
2022-11-14 19:38                                                                           ` Carl Love
     [not found]                                                               ` <191f5826b228a7614c084c9704b086851d418c78.camel@us.ibm.com>
     [not found]                                                                 ` <5405a79ecd6ed34646ad77eed0779063ee222d37.camel@de.ibm.com>
2022-10-06 16:36                                                                   ` [PATCH 0/2] PowerPC, fix support for printing the function return value for non-trivial values Carl Love
2022-10-18 18:55                                                                     ` [PATCH 0/2 version 2] " Carl Love
2022-10-06 16:37                                                                   ` [PATCH 2/2] " Carl Love
2022-10-08  4:36                                                                     ` Kevin Buettner
2022-10-12 17:01                                                                       ` Carl Love
2022-10-14  2:49                                                                     ` Kevin Buettner
2022-10-14  7:36                                                                       ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-14 23:25                                                                         ` Carl Love
2022-10-14 23:23                                                                       ` Carl Love
2022-10-18  1:06                                                                         ` Kevin Buettner
2022-10-18 18:26                                                                           ` Carl Love
2022-10-18 18:55                                                                     ` [PATCH 2/2 ver 2] " Carl Love
2022-10-31 16:07                                                                       ` Carl Love
2022-11-07 14:56                                                                       ` Bruno Larsen
2022-11-07 19:53                                                                         ` Carl Love
2022-11-07 20:04                                                                       ` [PATCH 2/2 ver 3] " Carl Love
2022-11-14 16:47                                                                         ` Ulrich Weigand
2022-11-15  7:15                                                                           ` Tom de Vries
2022-11-15 10:16                                                                             ` Ulrich Weigand
2022-11-15 16:04                                                                               ` Carl Love
2022-11-15 16:55                                                                                 ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-15 23:46                                                                                   ` Carl Love
2022-11-15 17:24                                                                               ` Carl Love [this message]
2022-11-15 18:05                                                                                 ` Ulrich Weigand
2022-11-16  1:01                                                                                   ` Carl Love
2022-11-16  9:52                                                                                     ` Ulrich Weigand
2022-11-16 10:12                                                                                     ` Tom de Vries
2022-11-16 10:20                                                                                     ` Lancelot SIX
2022-11-16 15:56                                                                                       ` Carl Love
2022-11-16 20:55                                                                                       ` [PATCH] Change NULL to nullptr in gdb/infcmd.c and gdb/infrun.c Carl Love
2022-11-16 21:15                                                                                         ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2466b7efc91dd4964add9a0d7ce4cd47678f5800.camel@us.ibm.com \
    --to=cel@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=blarsen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).