From: "Sébastien Michelland" <sebastien.michelland@lcis.grenoble-inp.fr>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PING] [PATCH v2] gdb: specify sh pointer register types
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:13:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ecb6676-fab7-4f7b-96d0-f867990f2f60@lcis.grenoble-inp.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240401100740.939986-1-sebastien.michelland@lcis.grenoble-inp.fr>
Hi everyone, kindly pinging for process for this patch.
Simon approved the approach on a previous version but this one still
needs validation, and ultimately a push if accepted.
I understand there is little maintenance going on for the sh target. Is
there additional testing I should do to help with this patch?
On 2024-04-01 11:55, Sébastien Michelland wrote:
> This patch fixes a pretty funny issue on sh targets that occurred
> because $pc (and similar registers) were typed as int. When $pc is in
> the upper half of the address space (i.e. kernel code on sh), `x/i $pc'
> would resolve to a negative value. At least in the case of a remote
> target with an Xfer memory map, this leads to a spurious "cannot access
> memory" error as negative addresses are out of bounds.
>
> (gdb) x/i $pc
> 0x8c202c04: Cannot access memory at address 0x8c202c04
> (gdb) x/i 0x8c202c04
> => 0x8c202c04 <gintctl_gint_gdb+304>: mov.l @r1,r10
>
> The issue is fixed by specifying pointer types for pc and other pointer
> registers. Code pointer registers on sh include pc, pr (return address
> of a call), vbr (interrupt handler) and spc (return address after
> interrupt). Data pointers include r15 (stack pointer) and gbr (base
> register for a few specific addressing modes).
> ---
>
> Compared to v1, this patch applies to all sh architectures. It also adds
> r15 (stack pointer) as a data pointer and sets gbr to a data rather than
> code pointer (which was a mistake).
>
> gdb/sh-tdep.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/sh-tdep.c b/gdb/sh-tdep.c
> index 1c67ea42..b76efa3a 100644
> --- a/gdb/sh-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/sh-tdep.c
> @@ -1400,6 +1400,11 @@ sh_sh2a_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg_nr)
> return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_float;
> else if (reg_nr >= DR0_REGNUM && reg_nr <= DR_LAST_REGNUM)
> return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_double;
> + else if (reg_nr == PC_REGNUM || reg_nr == PR_REGNUM || reg_nr == VBR_REGNUM
> + || reg_nr == SPC_REGNUM)
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_func_ptr;
> + else if (reg_nr == R0_REGNUM+15 || reg_nr == GBR_REGNUM)
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
> else
> return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_int;
> }
> @@ -1412,6 +1417,11 @@ sh_sh3e_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg_nr)
> if ((reg_nr >= gdbarch_fp0_regnum (gdbarch)
> && (reg_nr <= FP_LAST_REGNUM)) || (reg_nr == FPUL_REGNUM))
> return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_float;
> + else if (reg_nr == PC_REGNUM || reg_nr == PR_REGNUM || reg_nr == VBR_REGNUM
> + || reg_nr == SPC_REGNUM)
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_func_ptr;
> + else if (reg_nr == R0_REGNUM+15 || reg_nr == GBR_REGNUM)
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
> else
> return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_int;
> }
> @@ -1433,6 +1443,11 @@ sh_sh4_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg_nr)
> return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_double;
> else if (reg_nr >= FV0_REGNUM && reg_nr <= FV_LAST_REGNUM)
> return sh_sh4_build_float_register_type (gdbarch, 3);
> + else if (reg_nr == PC_REGNUM || reg_nr == PR_REGNUM || reg_nr == VBR_REGNUM
> + || reg_nr == SPC_REGNUM)
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_func_ptr;
> + else if (reg_nr == R0_REGNUM+15 || reg_nr == GBR_REGNUM)
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
> else
> return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_int;
> }
> @@ -1440,7 +1455,13 @@ sh_sh4_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg_nr)
> static struct type *
> sh_default_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg_nr)
> {
> - return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_int;
> + if (reg_nr == PC_REGNUM || reg_nr == PR_REGNUM || reg_nr == VBR_REGNUM
> + || reg_nr == SPC_REGNUM)
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_func_ptr;
> + else if (reg_nr == R0_REGNUM+15 || reg_nr == GBR_REGNUM)
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
> + else
> + return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_int;
> }
>
> /* Is a register in a reggroup?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-26 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-01 9:55 Sébastien Michelland
2024-04-09 23:18 ` Luis Machado
2024-04-10 7:03 ` Sébastien Michelland
2024-04-10 8:01 ` Luis Machado
2024-04-26 8:13 ` Sébastien Michelland [this message]
2024-04-26 14:00 ` [PING] " Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ecb6676-fab7-4f7b-96d0-f867990f2f60@lcis.grenoble-inp.fr \
--to=sebastien.michelland@lcis.grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).